| Literature DB >> 21347302 |
Cândida F Pereira1, Paula C Ellenberg, Kate L Jones, Tara L Fernandez, Redmond P Smyth, David J Hawkes, Marcel Hijnen, Valérie Vivet-Boudou, Roland Marquet, Iain Johnson, Johnson Mak.
Abstract
Due to its small size and versatility, the biarsenical-tetracysteine system is an attractive way to label viral proteins for live cell imaging. This study describes the genetic labeling of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) structural proteins (matrix, capsid and nucleocapsid), enzymes (protease, reverse transcriptase, RNAse H and integrase) and envelope glycoprotein 120 with a tetracysteine tag in the context of a full-length virus. We measure the impact of these modifications on the natural virus infection and, most importantly, present the first infectious HIV-1 construct containing a fluorescently-labeled nucleocapsid protein. Furthermore, due to the high background levels normally associated with the labeling of tetracysteine-tagged proteins we have also optimized a metabolic labeling system that produces infectious virus containing the natural envelope glycoproteins and specifically labeled tetracysteine-tagged proteins that can easily be detected after virus infection of T-lymphocytes. This approach can be adapted to other viral systems for the visualization of the interplay between virus and host cell during infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21347302 PMCID: PMC3037950 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Genetic labeling of HIV-1 proteins and its impact on virus infectivity.
(A) Diagram of the HIV-1 gag (red), pol (brown) and env (blue) open reading frames and the positions where the tetracysteine (TC) tag motif was inserted. The majority of the TC motifs were inserted five amino acids downstream (-N tags) or upstream (-C tags) of the protease cleavage site and the first or last five amino acids of the viral protein coding sequence were repeated to prevent alterations in the minimal recognition site for the viral protease. The left insert shows the crystal structure of the RT enzyme and the positions in the “thumb” region where the TC tag was inserted are shown in blue. The right insert shows the crystal structure of the Env gp120 and the positions in the V1/V2 region where the TC tag was inserted are shown in blue. (B) Virion protein processing profiles of 293T cell-derived HIVMA-C, HIVCA-N, HIVCA-C, HIVNC-N, HIVNC-C, HIVPR-C, HIVRT-N, HIVRT-C, HIVRN-N, HIVRN-C and HIVIN-N (lanes 1-12, respectively). HIV-1 proteins were detected by Western Blot using pooled HIV-positive patient sera. Data are representative of 2 independent experiments. (C) The infectivity of HIVMA-C, HIVCA-N, HIVCA-C, HIVNC-N, HIVNC-C, HIVPR-C, HIVRT-N, HIVRN-N, HIVRN-C and HIVIN-N was assessed by comparing their replication kinetics in peripheral blood mononuclear cells with HIVwt. Samples were collected at 3, 7, 11 and 14 days post infection, and the levels of virus replication were monitored using an in vitro reverse transcriptase assay that is specific for HIV-1 enzymatic activity. Data are representative of 2-3 independent donors. Error bars represent technical replicates. (D) The capacity of several HIVTC to enter target cells was assessed by measuring β-lactamase activity in MT-2 cells that have been infected with HIVTC containing a β-lactamase-Vpr fusion protein. Error bars, s.d. are based on the averages of 2-3 independent experiments. (E) The capacity of HIVTC to infect target cells was assessed by measuring luciferase activity in the indicator TZM-bl cells that have been infected with the indicated viruses. Error bars, s.d. are based on the averages of 2-3 independent experiments.
Overview of the modifications introduced in the HIV-1 genome.
| Construct | Amino acid sequence |
|
| |
| HIVMA-C |
|
| HIVCA-C |
|
| HIVNC-C |
|
| HIVPR-C |
|
| HIVRT-C |
|
| HIVRN-C |
|
|
| |
| HIVCA-N |
|
| HIVNC-N |
|
| HIVRT-N |
|
| HIVRN-N |
|
| HIVIN-N |
|
|
| |
| HIVRTt1 |
|
| HIVRTt2 |
|
| HIVEnv-V1 |
|
| HIVEnv-V2 |
|
Figure 2Improve the infectivity of the gag-TC viruses.
(A) Schematic representation of proviral DNA constructs used in the study. The HIVTC-ΔRev construct differs from HIVTC by the introduction of an early termination codon and a frameshift into exon 2 of the Rev sequence, which was removed to inactivate Rev function. This mutation also affects Env expression. HIVNFS is a full-length HIV-1 construct containing codon modifications in the -1 frameshift slippery sequences and the RNA pseudoknot in the gag reading frame to enable the expression of Gag but not Gag-Pol. (B) The capacity of HIVTC-ΔRev/NFS to infect target cells was assessed by measuring luciferase activity in the indicator TZM-bl cells that have been infected with the indicated viruses. Error bars, s.d. are based on the averages of 3-5 independent experiments.
Figure 3Labeling of tetracysteine-tagged matrix proteins of an infectious HIV-1 does not impact on virus function.
(A) Production of HIVwt and HIVMA-C from 293Ts that have been untreated (no FlAsH) or incubated with 1 µM FlAsH-EDT2 (FlAsH). The level of virus production was measured with an in vitro reverse transcriptase assay that is specific for HIV-1 enzymatic activity. Data are representative of 2 independent experiments. Error bars represent technical replicates. (B) Quantitative PCR analysis of the kinetics of HIV-1 cDNA synthesis during an infection in MT-2 cells. Cells were infected with HIVwt or with HIVwt and HIVMA-C produced in the presence of 1 µM FlAsH-EDT2 as described above (HIVwt-F and HIVMA-C-F). Cells were harvested at the indicated time points post-infection and analyzed by quantitative PCR for both early ([-]ssDNA) and late (post second strand transfer) HIV-1 reverse transcription products. HIV-1 cDNA copies were normalized by the number of copies of the CCR5 gene in the host cells. Data are representative of 2 independent experiments. (C-D) Specificity of the labeling of tetracysteine-tagged virus with biarsenical dyes. (C) HIVMA-C-F and HIVwt-F (cell-free virus) were immunostained with HIV-1 p17-MA and p24-CA mAb followed by donkey anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 647. (D) MT-2 cells were fixed after 20 min of synchronized infection with HIVMA-C-F or HIVwt-F and immunostained with HIV-1 p17-MA and p24-CA monoclonal antibodies followed by donkey anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 647 secondary antibody. Nuclei were labeled with Hoechst. FlAsH is shown in green, Alexa Fluor 647 in red and nuclei in blue. The provided images were derived from a volume compression of a z stack of 10-38 images taken at a 0.2-µm step size. Scale bar, 5 µm. Images are representative of more than 3 independent experiments. (E) MT-2 cells were infected with HIVNC-C or HIVNC-C-ΔRev/NFS(4∶1) produced in the presence of 1 µM FlAsH-EDT2 as described above (HIVNC-C-F or HIVNC-C-ΔRev/NFS(4∶1)-F, respectively). The infected cells were fixed after 4 h of synchronized infection, and the nuclei were labeled with Hoechst. FlAsH is shown in green and nuclei are shown in blue. The provided images were derived from a volume compression of a z stack of 26 images taken at a 0.5-µm step size. Scale bar, 5 µm. Images are representative of 2 independent experiments. (G) Quantification of the relative intensity of FlAsH staining using softWoRx software (Applied Precision, Issaquah, WA) following infection with HIVNC-C-F or HIVNC-C-ΔRev/NFS(4∶1)-F. Each symbol represents a separate field from the same experiment. The black lines show the mean. Data are representative of 2 independent experiments.
Primers used for site-directed mutagenesis.
| Name | Primers containing the tetracysteine motif (5′ ->3′) | |
| HIVMA-C | FW |
|
| RW |
| |
| HIVCA-N | FW |
|
| RW |
| |
| HIVCA-C | FW |
|
| RW |
| |
| HIVNC-N | FW |
|
| RW |
| |
| HIVNC-C | FW |
|
| RW |
| |
| HIVPR-C | FW |
|
| RW |
| |
| HIVRT-N | FW |
|
| RW |
| |
| HIVRT-C | FW |
|
| RW |
| |
| HIVRTt1 | FW |
|
| RW |
| |
| HIVRTt2 | FW |
|
| RW |
| |
| HIVRN-N | FW |
|
| RW |
| |
| HIVRN-C | FW |
|
| RW |
| |
| HIVIN-N | FW |
|
| RW |
| |
| HIVEnv-V1 | FW |
|
| RW |
| |
| HIVEnv-V2 | FW |
|
| RW |
| |