| Literature DB >> 21347119 |
Joshua E Richardson1, Joan S Ash, Dean F Sittig, Arwen Bunce, James Carpenter, Richard H Dykstra, Ken Guappone, James McCormack, Carmit K McMullen, Michael Shapiro, Adam Wright, Blackford Middleton.
Abstract
Clinical Decision Support (CDS) is viewed as a means to improve safety and efficiency in health care. Yet the lack of consensus about what is meant by CDS represents a barrier to effective design, implementation, and utilization of CDS tools. We conducted a multi-site qualitative inquiry to understand how different people define and describe CDS. Using subjects' multiple perspectives we were able to gain new insights as to what stakeholders want CDS to achieve and how to achieve it even when those perspectives are competing and conflicting.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21347119 PMCID: PMC3041401
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc ISSN: 1559-4076