Literature DB >> 21347069

A Rapid Usability Evaluation (RUE) Method for Health Information Technology.

Alissa L Russ1, Darrell A Baker, W Jeffrey Fahner, Bryce S Milligan, Leeann Cox, Heather K Hagg, Jason J Saleem.   

Abstract

Usability testing can help generate design ideas to enhance the quality and safety of health information technology. Despite these potential benefits, few healthcare organizations conduct systematic usability testing prior to software implementation. We used a Rapid Usability Evaluation (RUE) method to apply usability testing to software development at a major VA Medical Center. We describe the development of the RUE method, provide two examples of how it was successfully applied, and discuss key insights gained from this work. Clinical informaticists with limited usability training were able to apply RUE to improve software evaluation and elected to continue to use this technique. RUE methods are relatively simple, do not require advanced training or usability software, and should be easy to adopt. Other healthcare organizations may be able to implement RUE to improve software effectiveness, efficiency, and safety.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21347069      PMCID: PMC3041446     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  7 in total

1.  Low-cost rapid usability engineering: designing and customizing usable healthcare information systems.

Authors:  Andre W Kushniruk; Elizabeth M Borycki
Journal:  Healthc Q       Date:  2006

2.  A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: methodological aspects and empirical evidence.

Authors:  Monique W M Jaspers
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  Top EHR challenges in light of the stimulus. Enabling effective interdisciplinary, intradisciplinary and cross-setting communication.

Authors:  Andrew D Boyd; Elizabeth A Funk; Steven M Schwartz; Bonnie Kaplan; Gail M Keenan
Journal:  J Healthc Inf Manag       Date:  2010

4.  Comprehensive analysis of a medication dosing error related to CPOE.

Authors:  Jan Horsky; Gilad J Kuperman; Vimla L Patel
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Grand challenges in clinical decision support.

Authors:  Dean F Sittig; Adam Wright; Jerome A Osheroff; Blackford Middleton; Jonathan M Teich; Joan S Ash; Emily Campbell; David W Bates
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems.

Authors:  Andre W Kushniruk; Vimla L Patel
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.317

7.  Impact of clinical reminder redesign on learnability, efficiency, usability, and workload for ambulatory clinic nurses.

Authors:  Jason J Saleem; Emily S Patterson; Laura Militello; Shilo Anders; Mercedes Falciglia; Jennifer A Wissman; Emilie M Roth; Steven M Asch
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 4.497

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Development and Evaluation of a Mobile Decision Support System for Hypertension Management in the Primary Care Setting in Brazil: Mixed-Methods Field Study on Usability, Feasibility, and Utility.

Authors:  Daniel Vitório Silveira; Milena Soriano Marcolino; Elaine Leandro Machado; Camila Gonçalves Ferreira; Maria Beatriz Moreira Alkmim; Elmiro Santos Resende; Bárbara Couto Carvalho; André Pires Antunes; Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 4.773

2.  Agile, Easily Applicable, and Useful eHealth Usability Evaluations: Systematic Review and Expert-Validation.

Authors:  Irina Sinabell; Elske Ammenwerth
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.762

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.