Literature DB >> 21347005

Building an ontology for pressure ulcer risk assessment to allow data sharing and comparisons across hospitals.

Hyeoneui Kim1, Jeeyae Choi, Lelanie Secalag, Laura Dibsie, Aziz Boxwala, Lucila Ohno-Machado.   

Abstract

As a way to promote consistency and completeness of pressure ulcer risk assessment, as well as to establish a framework for data and knowledge sharing in this domain, we constructed an ontology that represents how the characteristics of the high risk patients defined by the Braden scale are operationalized at two different settings. We observed great similarity between the two study hospitals. Forty scenarios that portrayed patients at each site were added to the ontology and algorithmically assessed for pressure ulcer risk using the ontology reasoner FACT++. When validated by manual assessment by the nurses from each site, high consistency in the assessed risk level was observed with the average consistency score of 0.82 (SD= 0.06) out of 1.0. The results suggest that explicitly defining the site specific methods for assessing pressure ulcer risk that comply with the standard methods defined in the Braden scale can improve assessment consistency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21347005      PMCID: PMC3041354     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  13 in total

Review 1.  Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcers: a methodological review.

Authors:  Panos Papanikolaou; Patricia Lyne; Denis Anthony
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 5.837

Review 2.  Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcer prevention: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pedro L Pancorbo-Hidalgo; Francisco Pedro Garcia-Fernandez; Isabel Ma Lopez-Medina; Carmen Alvarez-Nieto
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  The effect of Web-based Braden Scale training on the reliability and precision of Braden Scale pressure ulcer risk assessments.

Authors:  Morris A Magnan; Joann Maklebust
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.741

4.  A quasi-experimental study to assess the effect of technology-assisted training on correct endorsement of pressure ulcer preventive interventions.

Authors:  JoAnn Maklebust; Morris A Magnan
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.

Authors:  Jan Kottner; Theo Dassen
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.837

6.  The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.

Authors:  N Bergstrom; B J Braden; A Laguzza; V Holman
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Ontology-based configuration of problem-solving methods and generation of knowledge-acquisition tools: application of PROTEGE-II to protocol-based decision support.

Authors:  S W Tu; H Eriksson; J H Gennari; Y Shahar; M A Musen
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 8.  A review of clinical decision making: models and current research.

Authors:  Maggi Banning
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 3.036

9.  Using an integrated ontology and information model for querying and reasoning about phenotypes: The case of autism.

Authors:  Samson W Tu; Samson Tu; Lakshika Tennakoon; Martin O'Connor; Martin Connor; Ravi Shankar; Amar Das
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

10.  Predicting pressure ulcer risk: a multisite study of the predictive validity of the Braden Scale.

Authors:  N Bergstrom; B Braden; M Kemp; M Champagne; E Ruby
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.381

View more
  4 in total

1.  Modeling Flowsheet Data to Support Secondary Use.

Authors:  Bonnie L Westra; Beverly Christie; Steven G Johnson; Lisiane Pruinelli; Anne LaFlamme; Suzan G Sherman; Jung In Park; Connie W Delaney; Grace Gao; Stuart Speedie
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Enhancement of decision rules to increase generalizability and performance of the rule-based system assessing risk for pressure ulcer.

Authors:  J Choi; H Kim
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Modeling Flowsheet Data for Clinical Research.

Authors:  Steven G Johnson; Matthew D Byrne; Beverly Christie; Connie W Delaney; Anne LaFlamme; Jung In Park; Lisiane Pruinelli; Suzan G Sherman; Stuart Speedie; Bonnie L Westra
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2015-03-25

4.  SAPPIRE: a prototype mobile tool for pressure ulcer risk assessment.

Authors:  Hyeoneui Kim; Heejoon Chung; Shuang Wang; Xiaoqian Jiang; Jeeyae Choi
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2014
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.