| Literature DB >> 21346807 |
Daniel T Halperin1, Owen Mugurungi, Timothy B Hallett, Backson Muchini, Bruce Campbell, Tapuwa Magure, Clemens Benedikt, Simon Gregson.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21346807 PMCID: PMC3035617 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000414
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Med ISSN: 1549-1277 Impact factor: 11.069
Figure 1Summary of epidemiological findings.
(A) Estimated trends in HIV prevalence, incidence, and AIDS deaths using a mathematical model of HIV transmission fitted to antenatal and household-based estimates of HIV prevalence, 1980–2010. HIV incidence peaks around 1991 and declines as part of the natural course of epidemic maturation; incidence decline is accelerated between about 1999 and 2003 due to reductions in sexual risk behavior [14]. (As has been noted [14], incidence declined a little earlier in urban areas. The model suggests behavior change could have continued partly into 2004 in rural areas, but the majority of changes were concentrated within the 1999–2003 period [14].) (B) Changes in key indicators of sexual partnership formation taken from the nationally representative DHSs (1999 and 2005/6) and surveys in Manicaland, rural eastern Zimbabwe (1998–2000 and 2001–2003) [13],[16].
Figure 2Levels of marriage and secondary education among men in urban areas in eight southern African countries.
Estimates are for men aged 17–43 years (in Botswana, ages 14–48 years) in the years 2000–2006, chosen to maximize the overlap of temporal range between surveys and the age groups that contribute most to HIV transmission. All those with any secondary education were counted as having secondary education. “Married” category does not include those who were cohabiting but not married. Sources: DHS surveys performed in the years indicated in the legend, with the exception of Botswana (using the methodologically similar Botswana AIDS Impact Survey, 2001).
Contributions of proximate causes to the HIV decline in Zimbabwe.
| Proximate Cause | Population-Level Effectiveness | Extent of Change | Consistency in Timing of Change | Major Contribution |
|
| ||||
| Age at first sex - postponement | Low | Low [QN] | Consistent | Unlikely |
| Partner numbers - reduction | High | High [QN & QL] | Consistent | Likely |
| Condom use - increase (in non-marital partnerships) | High (if consistent use) | Moderate [P, QN, QL] | Earlier | Plausible |
|
| ||||
| Transmission probability - reduction | High | Low [QN & P] | Earlier | Unlikely |
Form(s) of evidence supporting conclusion: M, epidemiological modeling; QN, survey data; P, program data; QL, qualitative data. See Text S1 for details.
Extent to which changes in the factor concerned can reduce HIV transmission at the population level, as measured and modeled in scientific studies [M & QN].
Extent to which changes in the given behavioral or biological determinant (by population sub-group) have occurred as observed in longitudinal surveys and/or program data.
Extent to which the changes in risk behavior etc. occurred during the period of most rapid reduction in risk as determined by the epidemiological modeling assessment (i.e., about 1999–2003).
Transmission probability could be affected by, for example, levels of blood safety, prevalence of other sexually transmitted infections, HIV medications, or male circumcision.
Contributions of underlying factors and programs to the HIV decline in Zimbabwe.
| Underlying or Programmatic Cause | Causal Pathway | Population-Level Effectiveness | Exposure/Coverage | Consistency in Timing of Change | Major Contribution |
|
| |||||
| AIDS deaths became much more noticeable | Close relatives & friends (& babies) dying, funerals → fear → behavior change [QL] | High [QL] | General population [M, QN, QL] | Consistent | Likely (primary) |
|
| |||||
| Economic decline/increasing poverty | Less disposal income → ↓ commercial/extramarital sex [QL] | High [QL] | General population [QN, QL] | Consistent/later | Likely |
|
| |||||
| Mass media | Info/changes in social norms → behavior change [QL] | Potentially high [QL] | General population [QN, P, QL] | Gradual (early 1990s→) | Plausible |
| Church teaching & programs | Info/changes in social norms → behavior change [QL] | Potentially high [QL] | General population [QN, P, QL] | Gradual (early 1990s→) | Plausiblec |
| Workplace & other interpersonal communication | Info/changes in social norms → behavior change [QL] | Potentially high [QL] | General population [QN, P, QL] | Gradual, ↑ after late 1990s | Plausiblec |
| School & other youth programs | Info/changes in social norms → behavior change [QL] | Potentially high [QL] | Youth [P, QL] | Earlier (early 1990s→) | Plausiblec |
| Sex workers & clients (peer education, etc.) | ↑Consistent condom use, ↓sex work visits | ? | Urban core/bridge populations [P,QL] | Gradual | Plausible |
| Condom programming | ↑Consistent condom use (for casual sex) | Moderate | Casual relationships [QN, P, QL] | Gradual (early 1990s→) | Plausible |
| Counseling and testing | ↑Knowledge of HIV status → behavior change (in HIV+s) | Low | General population [QN, P, QL] | Scaled-up after 2002 | Unlikely |
|
| |||||
| Blood/injection safety | ↓Transmission probability | High | Transfusion recipients [P] | Early (1980s→) | Unlikely |
| Treatment of sexually transmitted diseases | ↓Transmission probability | Low? | STI patients [P, QL] | Early (late 1980s→) | Unlikely |
| Prevention of mother-to-child transmission | Fewer long-term survivors from infant infection | Low (in adults) | Infants [P] | Scaled-up after 2003 | Unlikely |
| Antiretroviral medications | ↓Transmission probability | Low | PLWHA [P] | Scaled-up after 2005 | Unlikely |
Form(s) of evidence supporting conclusion: M, epidemiological modeling; QN, survey or other quantitative data; P, program data; QL, qualitative data. See Text S1 for details.
Extent to which change in the factor concerned is likely to effect behavior change, and thereby reduce HIV transmission at the population level.
Extent to which the intervention was scaled-up during the period of most rapid reduction in risk as determined by the epidemiological modeling assessment (i.e., about 1999–2003).
Behavior change programs as a whole probably contributed to reducing HIV risk but, given the limitations in the available data, it was not possible to isolate the contributions (if any) of each individual program area.
“?” indicates greater uncertainty.