Literature DB >> 21346616

A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, fixed-dose, clinical trial of quetiapine at 600 versus 1200 mg/d for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

Jean-Pierre Lindenmayer1, Leslie Citrome, Anzalee Khan, Sashank Kaushik, Saurabh Kaushik.   

Abstract

Quetiapine is often prescribed at doses higher than those approved by regulatory authorities, with limited evidence from controlled trials. The objective of this study was to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of high-dose quetiapine (1200 mg/d) compared with a standard dose of 600 mg/d among patients with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder hospitalized at 2 state-operated psychiatric facilities. In order to be eligible for randomization, subjects were required to prospectively fail to demonstrate an initial therapeutic response during a 4-week run-in phase with quetiapine at 600 mg/d (immediate release and dosed twice a day). Lack of an adequate initial response was defined a 15% or lower decrease in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score. Patients were then randomized to either continue quetiapine at 600 mg/d for an additional 8 weeks or to receive 1200 mg/d quetiapine instead. No significant differences were observed between the high dose (n = 29) and standard dose (n = 31) groups in change from baseline to endpoint on extrapyramidal symptoms, electrocardiographic changes, or most laboratory measures between groups. There was a significant difference between groups for triglycerides (P = 0.035), and post hoc tests revealed a decrease in triglycerides from baseline (mean [SD], 162.7 [59.3] mg/dL) to endpoint (mean [SD], 134.8 [62.7] mg/dL) for the 600 mg/d group (P = 0.019). The mean change in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score did not differ between groups. In conclusion, quetiapine at 1200 mg/d, although reasonably tolerated, did not confer any advantages over quetiapine at 600 mg/d among patients who had failed to demonstrate an adequate response to a prospective 4-week trial of 600 mg/d.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21346616     DOI: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31820f4fe0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0271-0749            Impact factor:   3.153


  6 in total

1.  Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain: Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Hui Wu; Spyridon Siafis; Tasnim Hamza; Johannes Schneider-Thoma; John M Davis; Georgia Salanti; Stefan Leucht
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 7.348

2.  Almost all antipsychotics result in weight gain: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maarten Bak; Annemarie Fransen; Jouke Janssen; Jim van Os; Marjan Drukker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Increasing antipsychotic dose versus switching antipsychotic for non response in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Myrto T Samara; Elisabeth Klupp; Bartosz Helfer; Philipp H Rothe; Johannes Schneider-Thoma; Stefan Leucht
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-11

Review 4.  Increasing antipsychotic dose for non response in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Myrto T Samara; Elisabeth Klupp; Bartosz Helfer; Philipp H Rothe; Johannes Schneider-Thoma; Stefan Leucht
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-11

5.  Treatment of early non-response in patients with schizophrenia: assessing the efficacy of antipsychotic dose escalation.

Authors:  Antony Loebel; Leslie Citrome; Christoph U Correll; Jane Xu; Josephine Cucchiaro; John M Kane
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  Lurasidone Improves Psychopathology and Cognition in Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Herbert Y Meltzer; Daniel B Share; Karu Jayathilake; Ronald M Salomon; Myung A Lee
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.118

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.