Literature DB >> 21346586

The Shang Ring device for adult male circumcision: a proof of concept study in Kenya.

Mark A Barone1, Frederick Ndede, Philip S Li, Puneet Masson, Quentin Awori, Jairus Okech, Peter Cherutich, Nicholas Muraguri, Paul Perchal, Richard Lee, Howard H Kim, Marc Goldstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess safety, preliminary efficacy, and acceptability of the Shang Ring, a novel disposable device for adult male circumcision in Kenya.
METHODS: Forty HIV-negative men were recruited in Homa Bay, Kenya. Circumcisions were performed by a trained physician or nurse working with 1 assistant. Follow-up was conducted at 2, 7, 9, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 days after circumcision. Rings were removed on day 7. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) (0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible). Men were interviewed at enrollment and on days 7 and 42.
RESULTS: All 40 procedures were completed successfully. Mean procedure and device removal times were 4.8 (SD ± 2.0) and 3.9 (SD ± 2.6) minutes, respectively. There were 6 mild adverse events, including 3 penile skin injuries, 2 cases of edema, and 1 infection; all resolved with conservative management. In addition, there were 3 partial ring detachments between days 2-7. None required treatment or early ring removal. Erections with the ring were well tolerated, with a mean pain score of 3.5 (SD ± 2.3). By day 2, 80% of men were back to work. At 42 days, all participants were very satisfied with their circumcision and would recommend the procedure to others.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the Shang Ring is safe for further study in Africa. Acceptability of the Shang Ring among participants was excellent. With short procedure times, less surgical skill required, and the ease with which it can be used by nonphysicians, the Shang Ring could facilitate rapid roll-out of male circumcision in sub-Saharan Africa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21346586     DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182158967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr        ISSN: 1525-4135            Impact factor:   3.731


  32 in total

Review 1.  Voluntary medical male circumcision: an HIV prevention priority for PEPFAR.

Authors:  Jason Bailey Reed; Emmanuel Njeuhmeli; Anne Goldzier Thomas; Melanie C Bacon; Robert Bailey; Peter Cherutich; Kelly Curran; Kim Dickson; Tim Farley; Catherine Hankins; Karin Hatzold; Jessica Justman; Zebedee Mwandi; Luke Nkinsi; Renee Ridzon; Caroline Ryan; Naomi Bock
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 2.  Male circumcision: a globally relevant but under-utilized method for the prevention of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Aaron A R Tobian; Seema Kacker; Thomas C Quinn
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 13.739

Review 3.  HIV prevention transformed: the new prevention research agenda.

Authors:  Nancy S Padian; Sandra I McCoy; Salim S Abdool Karim; Nina Hasen; Julia Kim; Michael Bartos; Elly Katabira; Stefano M Bertozzi; Bernhard Schwartländer; Myron S Cohen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Authors' reply: Proper surgical training and grading of complications for Shang Ring circumcision are necessary.

Authors:  Samuel Kanyago; David M Riding; Mark J Siedner
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.731

5.  Proper surgical training and grading of complications for Shang Ring circumcision are necessary.

Authors:  Richard Lee; E Charles Osterberg; Philip S Li; Marc Goldstein; Mark Barone; Stephanie L Combes; David Sokal; Ron Gray; Godfrey Kigozi; Stephen Watya
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.731

6.  The acceptability and safety of the Shang Ring for adult male circumcision in Rakai, Uganda.

Authors:  Godfrey Kigozi; Richard Musoke; Stephen Watya; Nehemiah Kighoma; Paschal Ssebbowa; David Serwadda; Fred Nalugoda; Frederick Makumbi; Philip Li; Richard Lee; Marc Goldstein; Maria Wawer; Nelson Sewankambo; Ronald H Gray
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.731

7.  Shang Ring versus forceps-guided adult male circumcision: a randomized, controlled effectiveness study in southwestern Uganda.

Authors:  Samuel Kanyago; David M Riding; Elichum Mutakooha; Alcides Lopez de la O; Mark J Siedner
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 8.  Voluntary medical male circumcision in resource-constrained settings.

Authors:  Aaron A R Tobian; Tigistu Adamu; Jason B Reed; Valerian Kiggundu; Youseph Yazdi; Emmanuel Njeuhmeli
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  A 'snip' in time: what is the best age to circumcise?

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Jake H Waskett; Joya Banerjee; Richard G Wamai; Aaron A R Tobian; Ronald H Gray; Stefan A Bailis; Robert C Bailey; Jeffrey D Klausner; Robin J Willcourt; Daniel T Halperin; Thomas E Wiswell; Adrian Mindel
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  The PrePex device is unlikely to achieve cost-savings compared to the forceps-guided method in male circumcision programs in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Walter Obiero; Marisa R Young; Robert C Bailey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.