Literature DB >> 21346365

Effects of antihistamines on innate immune responses to severe bacterial infection in mice.

Martin Metz1, Elizabeth Doyle, Carsten Bindslev-Jensen, Takeshi Watanabe, Torsten Zuberbier, Marcus Maurer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sedating and non-sedating histamine H(1) receptor (H1R) antagonists and H2R blockers are widely used drugs which are generally considered to be safe medications. However, recently, these drugs have been shown to possibly impair the outcome of perforating appendicitis in children.
OBJECTIVE: It was the aim of this study to characterize the effects of histamine receptor blockade in severe bacterial infections in more detail.
METHODS: To obtain information on the safety of histamine receptor blockade in more detail, we used pharmacological and genetic approaches targeting histamine receptors and performed cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), a mouse model of septic peritonitis. After induction of septic peritonitis, morbidity and mortality were monitored closely.
RESULTS: Here, we show that oral treatment with first-generation H1R antihistamine diphenhydramine, H2R blocker cimetidine and H3/4R blocker thioperamide impairs optimal innate immune responses in severe murine bacterial sepsis. However, these adverse effects are not mediated by H1R, as mice deficient for H1R show similar rates of morbidity and mortality after CLP as their wild-type controls. Similarly, the second-generation antihistamine desloratadine neither affects morbidity nor mortality after CLP.
CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that sedating first-generation H1R antihistamines and H2R blockers might impair innate immune responses to bacteria and that these drugs should be used with caution in patients with severe bacterial infections.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21346365     DOI: 10.1159/000321614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol        ISSN: 1018-2438            Impact factor:   2.749


  6 in total

1.  Dynamic analysis of histamine-mediated attenuation of acetylcholine-induced sweating via GSK3β activation.

Authors:  Saki Matsui; Hiroyuki Murota; Aya Takahashi; Lingli Yang; Jeong-Beom Lee; Kouta Omiya; Masato Ohmi; Junichi Kikuta; Masaru Ishii; Ichiro Katayama
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 8.551

2.  Identification of a proton-chloride antiporter (EriC) by Himar1 transposon mutagenesis in Lactobacillus reuteri and its role in histamine production.

Authors:  P Hemarajata; J K Spinler; M A Balderas; J Versalovic
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 2.271

3.  Exogenous carbon monoxide attenuates inflammatory responses in the small intestine of septic mice.

Authors:  Xu Wang; Jie Cao; Bing-Wei Sun; Da-Dong Liu; Feng Liang; Liang Gao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Histamine Regulates Actin Cytoskeleton in Human Toll-like Receptor 4-activated Monocyte-derived Dendritic Cells Tuning CD4+ T Lymphocyte Response.

Authors:  Alessandra Aldinucci; Elena Bonechi; Cinzia Manuelli; Daniele Nosi; Emanuela Masini; Maria Beatrice Passani; Clara Ballerini
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  High-Affinity Chemotaxis to Histamine Mediated by the TlpQ Chemoreceptor of the Human Pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Andrés Corral-Lugo; Miguel A Matilla; David Martín-Mora; Hortencia Silva Jiménez; Noel Mesa Torres; Junichi Kato; Akiko Hida; Shota Oku; Mayte Conejero-Muriel; Jose A Gavira; Tino Krell
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 7.867

Review 6.  Could Histamine H1 Receptor Antagonists Be Used for Treating COVID-19?

Authors:  Changbo Qu; Gwenny M Fuhler; Yihang Pan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.