Literature DB >> 21346258

Effect of an onboard event recorder and a formal review process on ambulance driving behaviour.

Lucas A Myers1, Christopher S Russi, Matt D Will, Daniel G Hankins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Onboard event recorders in vehicles record external and internal video before and after when preset g-force limits are exceeded. The use of these recorders in a fleet of ambulances, along with formal review, may decrease the number of unsafe driving events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the number of driving events since the inception of DriveCam technology in a fleet.
METHODS: 54 vehicles were outfitted with DriveCam event recorders in 2003. Events were captured and assigned a categorical severity score of 1-4 (1 being the lowest severity) when the vehicle exceeded preset g-force limits. An event was assigned a score of 'good' if the review determined that the driver demonstrated good judgement. A review and feedback process was implemented in August 2006 and analysed through June 2008.
RESULTS: During the study period, 2 979 891 miles were driven for 115 019 ambulance responses, with 6009 events captured. Events were categorised as follows: 2008 (33.4%) level 1; 3726 (62.0%) level 2; 175 (2.9%) level 3; 3 (0.05%) level 4; and 97 (1.6%) good events. The proportion of all events per mile and all events per response decreased over time with use of the recorder and review and feedback.
CONCLUSIONS: The institution of video event recorder technology along with formal review and feedback resulted in a change in driving behaviour. Given that call volumes increased and driving events decreased, these measures may serve as surrogates for improvements in safety and maintenance costs. Economic analysis is necessary for conclusions on fiscal impact.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21346258     DOI: 10.1136/emj.2010.104034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  7 in total

1.  Video Feedback Intervention to Enhance the Safety of Older Drivers With Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Brian R Ott; Jennifer D Davis; Kimberly Bixby
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr

2.  Driving Safety of Cognitively-Impaired Drivers Based on Near Collisions in Naturalistic Driving.

Authors:  Mojtaba Moharrer; Shuhang Wang; Jennifer D Davis; Brian R Ott; Gang Luo
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis Rep       Date:  2020-01-02

3.  Video feedback intervention for cognitively impaired older drivers: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Brian R Ott; George D Papandonatos; Erin M Burke; Donna Erdman; David B Carr; Jennifer D Davis
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2021-03-03

4.  Driving Speeds in Urgent and Non-Urgent Ambulance Missions during Normal and Reduced Winter Speed Limit Periods-A Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Jukka Pappinen; Hilla Nordquist
Journal:  Nurs Rep       Date:  2022-02-03

5.  Detection of Risky Driving Behaviors in the Naturalistic Environment in Healthy Older Adults and Mild Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Jennifer D Davis; Shuhang Wang; Elena K Festa; Gang Luo; Mojtaba Moharrer; Justine Bernier; Brian R Ott
Journal:  Geriatrics (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-21

6.  Evaluation of the Driving Safety of Visually Impaired Bioptic Drivers Based on Critical Events in Naturalistic Driving.

Authors:  Mojtaba Moharrer; Shuhang Wang; Bradley E Dougherty; Walter Cybis; Brian R Ott; Jennifer D Davis; Gang Luo
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Evaluation of Naturalistic Driving Behavior Using In-Vehicle Monitoring Technology in Preclinical and Early Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Jennifer D Davis; Ganesh M Babulal; George D Papandonatos; Erin M Burke; Christopher B Rosnick; Brian R Ott; Catherine M Roe
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-10-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.