Deepak A Lamba1, Thomas A Reh. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A number of protocols have been published to induce retinal determination from human embryonic stem cells (hESC) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC). Although all these studies have shown some degree of expression of markers of retinal cells, fewer than 30 markers are typically used to characterize the ESC-derived retinal cells. Hence, it is not known whether they express all the genes present in normal developing retinal cells. To assess the efficiency of their retinal determination protocol at the transcriptome level and to understand the changes in human retinal gene expression patterns during development, the authors conducted a microarray-based analysis comparing human retina to hESC-derived retinal cells. METHODS: The authors extracted total RNA from 60-day, 80-day, and 96-day human fetal retina and hESC-derived retinal cells at 3 weeks and 9 weeks after induction. RNA was subjected to analysis using a commercial microarray. Data were normalized using Affymetrix Power Tools and analyzed using commercial microarray software. RESULTS: On K-median clustering analysis, the authors found that overall there was a very high correlation between genes expressed in human fetal retina and those in ESC-derived retinal cultures. The cultures were at similar developmental ages to the corresponding fetal retinal ages. They found only 1% of the genes on the array to be expressed at a higher level in ESC-derived retinal cells than in fetal retina, and most of these were expressed in the retinal pigment epithelium and ciliary epithelium. CONCLUSIONS: In sum, gene array profiling provides an effective method for characterization of the efficiency of directed differentiation of hESCs to retinal cells.
PURPOSE: A number of protocols have been published to induce retinal determination from human embryonic stem cells (hESC) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC). Although all these studies have shown some degree of expression of markers of retinal cells, fewer than 30 markers are typically used to characterize the ESC-derived retinal cells. Hence, it is not known whether they express all the genes present in normal developing retinal cells. To assess the efficiency of their retinal determination protocol at the transcriptome level and to understand the changes in human retinal gene expression patterns during development, the authors conducted a microarray-based analysis comparing human retina to hESC-derived retinal cells. METHODS: The authors extracted total RNA from 60-day, 80-day, and 96-day human fetal retina and hESC-derived retinal cells at 3 weeks and 9 weeks after induction. RNA was subjected to analysis using a commercial microarray. Data were normalized using Affymetrix Power Tools and analyzed using commercial microarray software. RESULTS: On K-median clustering analysis, the authors found that overall there was a very high correlation between genes expressed in human fetal retina and those in ESC-derived retinal cultures. The cultures were at similar developmental ages to the corresponding fetal retinal ages. They found only 1% of the genes on the array to be expressed at a higher level in ESC-derived retinal cells than in fetal retina, and most of these were expressed in the retinal pigment epithelium and ciliary epithelium. CONCLUSIONS: In sum, gene array profiling provides an effective method for characterization of the efficiency of directed differentiation of hESCs to retinal cells.
Authors: Alexander I Saeed; Nirmal K Bhagabati; John C Braisted; Wei Liang; Vasily Sharov; Eleanor A Howe; Jianwei Li; Mathangi Thiagarajan; Joseph A White; John Quackenbush Journal: Methods Enzymol Date: 2006 Impact factor: 1.600
Authors: G Challen; B Gardiner; G Caruana; X Kostoulias; G Martinez; M Crowe; D F Taylor; J Bertram; M Little; S M Grimmond Journal: Physiol Genomics Date: 2005-07-05 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Kristopher Schwab; Larry T Patterson; Bruce J Aronow; Ruth Luckas; Hung-Chi Liang; S Steven Potter Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: M Pellegrini; G Pilia; S Pantano; F Lucchini; M Uda; M Fumi; A Cao; D Schlessinger; A Forabosco Journal: Dev Dyn Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 3.780
Authors: Abby Leigh Manthey; Wei Liu; Zhi Xin Jiang; Marcus Hiu Kong Lee; Jian Ji; Kwok-Fai So; Jimmy Shiu Ming Lai; Vincent Wing Hong Lee; Kin Chiu Journal: Cell Transplant Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Jason S Meyer; Sara E Howden; Kyle A Wallace; Amelia D Verhoeven; Lynda S Wright; Elizabeth E Capowski; Isabel Pinilla; Jessica M Martin; Shulan Tian; Ron Stewart; Bikash Pattnaik; James A Thomson; David M Gamm Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 6.277
Authors: Kati Juuti-Uusitalo; Hanna Vaajasaari; Tuomas Ryhänen; Susanna Narkilahti; Riitta Suuronen; Eliisa Mannermaa; Kai Kaarniranta; Heli Skottman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-01-17 Impact factor: 3.240