BACKGROUND: Oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a subtype of head-and-neck cancer with a distinct clinical and prognostic profile. While there are calls to undertake HPV testing for oropharyngeal SCCs within the diagnostic setting and for clinical trials, there are currently no internationally accepted standards. METHODS: 142 tonsil SCCs were tested using p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC), high-risk HPV DNA in situ hybridisation (ISH) and HPV DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR; GP5+/6+ primers). RESULTS: There were high levels of agreement between pathologists for p16 IHC and HPV ISH scoring; however, around 10% of HPV ISH cases showed some interobserver discrepancy that was resolved by slide review. The combination of p16 IHC and HPV ISH classified 53% of the samples as HPV-positive, whereas the combination of p16 IHC and HPV PCR classified 61% of the samples as HPV-positive. By employing a three-tiered, staged algorithm (p16 IHC/HPV ISH/HPV PCR), the authors were able to classify 98% of the cases as either HPV-positive (p16 IHC+/HPV DNA+; 62%) or HPV-negative (p16 IHC-/HPV DNA-; 35%). CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that using a combination of p16 IHC/HPV ISH/HPV PCR, in a three-tiered, staged algorithm, in conjunction with consensus reporting of HPV ISH, leads to less equivocal molecular classification. In order to ensure consistent reporting of this emerging disease, it is increasingly important for the head-and-neck oncology community to define the minimum requirements for assigning a diagnosis of 'HPV-related' oropharyngeal SCC in order to inform prognosis and for stratification in clinical trials.
BACKGROUND: Oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a subtype of head-and-neck cancer with a distinct clinical and prognostic profile. While there are calls to undertake HPV testing for oropharyngeal SCCs within the diagnostic setting and for clinical trials, there are currently no internationally accepted standards. METHODS: 142 tonsil SCCs were tested using p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC), high-risk HPV DNA in situ hybridisation (ISH) and HPV DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR; GP5+/6+ primers). RESULTS: There were high levels of agreement between pathologists for p16 IHC and HPV ISH scoring; however, around 10% of HPV ISH cases showed some interobserver discrepancy that was resolved by slide review. The combination of p16 IHC and HPV ISH classified 53% of the samples as HPV-positive, whereas the combination of p16 IHC and HPV PCR classified 61% of the samples as HPV-positive. By employing a three-tiered, staged algorithm (p16 IHC/HPV ISH/HPV PCR), the authors were able to classify 98% of the cases as either HPV-positive (p16 IHC+/HPV DNA+; 62%) or HPV-negative (p16 IHC-/HPV DNA-; 35%). CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that using a combination of p16 IHC/HPV ISH/HPV PCR, in a three-tiered, staged algorithm, in conjunction with consensus reporting of HPV ISH, leads to less equivocal molecular classification. In order to ensure consistent reporting of this emerging disease, it is increasingly important for the head-and-neck oncology community to define the minimum requirements for assigning a diagnosis of 'HPV-related' oropharyngeal SCC in order to inform prognosis and for stratification in clinical trials.
Authors: Justin A Bishop; Zahra Maleki; Alexandra Valsamakis; Takenori Ogawa; Xiaofei Chang; Sara I Pai; William H Westra Journal: Cancer Cytopathol Date: 2011-07-12 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Silvia T Elias; Carolina C S Macedo; Luiz A Simeoni; Dâmaris Silveira; Pérola O Magalhães; Adriana Lofrano-Porto; Ricardo D Coletta; Francisco A R Neves; Eliete N S Guerra Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2016 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Christine H Chung; Qiang Zhang; Christina S Kong; Jonathan Harris; Elana J Fertig; Paul M Harari; Dian Wang; Kevin P Redmond; George Shenouda; Andy Trotti; David Raben; Maura L Gillison; Richard C Jordan; Quynh-Thu Le Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-09-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Marc Arbyn; Silvia de Sanjosé; Mona Saraiya; Mario Sideri; Joel Palefsky; Charles Lacey; Maura Gillison; Laia Bruni; Guglielmo Ronco; Nicolas Wentzensen; Julia Brotherton; You-Lin Qiao; Lynnette Denny; Jacob Bornstein; Laurent Abramowitz; Anna Giuliano; Massimo Tommasino; Joseph Monsonego Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2012-07-02 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Silvia T Elias; Gabriel A Borges; Danilo A Amorim; Daniela F Rêgo; Luiz A Simeoni; Dâmaris Silveira; Yris Maria Fonseca-Bazzo; José E Paula; Christopher William Fagg; Ivelone M C Barros; Wenzel C Abreu; Décio S Pinto-Júnior; Pérola O Magalhães; Francisco A R Neves; Adriana Lofrano-Porto; Eliete N S Guerra Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Justin A Bishop; Xiao-Jun Ma; Hongwei Wang; Yuling Luo; Peter B Illei; Shanaz Begum; Janis M Taube; Wayne M Koch; William H Westra Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 6.394