Literature DB >> 21345690

Conventional aortic valve replacement for high-risk aortic stenosis patients not suitable for trans-catheter aortic valve implantation: feasibility and outcome.

Ioannis Dimarakis1, Syed M Rehman, Stuart W Grant, Duraisamy M T Saravanan, Richard D Levy, Ben Bridgewater, Isaac Kadir.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: High-risk patients with aortic stenosis are increasingly referred to specialist multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) for consideration of trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). A subgroup of these cases is unsuitable for TAVI, and high-risk conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) is undertaken. We have studied our outcomes in this cohort.
METHODS: Data prospectively collected between March 2008 and November 2009 for patients (n = 28, nine male) undergoing high-risk AVR were analysed. The mean age was 78.4 ± 9.2 years. The mean additive EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) was 10.0 ± 3.6 and mean logistic EuroSCORE was 19.9 ± 18.8. Three patients had undergone previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
RESULTS: The mean ejection fraction was 51 ± 16%, mean valve area 0.56 ± 0.19 cm², and mean peak gradient 91 ± 27 mm Hg. Ascending aortic, right axillary artery and femoral artery cannulation was used in 64%, 29% and 7% of cases, respectively. Median cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 84 (68-143) min and 111 (94-223) min. The median (range) inserted valve size was 21 (19-25) mm. Median intensive care and overall hospital stay were 5 (2-37) and 11 (5-44) days, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 4% (one patient). Postoperative complications included re-operation for bleeding (7%), renal failure (21%), tracheostomy (14%), sternal wound infection (7%), atrial fibrillation (25%) and permanent pacemaker implantation (7%). Kaplan-Meier survival at median follow-up of 359 (148-744) days was 81% (one further death of non-cardiac aetiology). Quality-of-life assessment at follow-up also yielded satisfactory results.
CONCLUSIONS: MDT assessment of high-risk aortic stenosis in the era of TAVI has increased the number of referrals. Conventional open surgery remains a valid option for these patients, with acceptable in-hospital mortality and early/midterm outcomes but high in-hospital morbidity.
Copyright © 2011 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21345690     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.12.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  6 in total

Review 1.  New conduction abnormalities after TAVI--frequency and causes.

Authors:  Robert M van der Boon; Rutger-Jan Nuis; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Luc Jordaens; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Ron T van Domburg; Patrick W Serruys; Robert H Anderson; Peter P T de Jaegere
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Optimal timing of aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Akira Marumoto; Yoshinobu Nakamura; Yuichiro Kishimoto; Munehiro Saiki; Motonobu Nishimura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity-Matched Study From the UK National Data.

Authors:  Rizwan Q Attia; Graeme L Hickey; Stuart W Grant; Ben Bridgewater; James C Roxburgh; Pankaj Kumar; Paul Ridley; Moninder Bhabra; Russell W J Millner; Thanos Athanasiou; Roberto Casula; Andrew Chukwuemka; Thasee Pillay; Christopher P Young
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

4.  High Risk Aortic Valve Replacement - The Challenges of Multiple Treatment Strategies with an Evolving Technology.

Authors:  K Booth; R Beattie; M McBride; G Manoharan; M Spence; J M Jones
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2016-01

Review 5.  Surgical treatment of elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis in the modern era - review.

Authors:  Anna Kwiecień; Tomasz Hrapkowicz; Krzysztof Filipiak; Roman Przybylski; Marcin Kaczmarczyk; Anetta Kowalczuk; Marian Zembala
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2018-09-24

6.  The impact of frailty in aortic valve surgery.

Authors:  Elisabet Berastegui Garcia; Maria Luisa Camara Rosell; Enrique Moret Ruiz; Irma Casas Garcia; Sara Badia Gamarra; Claudio Fernandez Gallego; Luis Delgado Ramis; Ignasi Julia Almill; Anna Llorens Ferrer; Bernat Romero Ferrer; Antoni Bayes Genis; Christian Muñoz Guijosa
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.921

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.