Literature DB >> 21345632

Actual imaging time in fetal MRI.

Peter C Brugger1, Daniela Prayer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Safety issues in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are important, especially in fetal MRI. However, since basic data with respect of the effective exposure time in fetal MRI are not available, this study aimed to determine the actual imaging time during a fetal MRI study.
METHODS: 100 fetal MRI studies of singleton pregnancies performed on a 1.5 T system were analysed with respect to study duration (from starting the survey scan until the end of study), the number of sequences acquired, and the actual imaging time, which was calculated by adding up scan time of each sequence. Furthermore, each sequence type was analysed regarding the number of acquisitions, specific absorption rates (SAR), and duration.
RESULTS: Mean study duration was 34.6 min (range: 14-58 min; standard deviation (SD): 9.7 min), the average number of sequences acquired was 26.6 (range: 11-44, SD: 6.6). Actual scan time averaged 11.4 min (range: 4-19 min, SD: 4.0 min). Ultrafast T2-weighted and steady-state free-precession sequences accounted for 62.3% of actual scan time, and were distributed over the whole duration of the study.
CONCLUSION: Actual imaging time only accounts for 33% of total study time and is not continuous. The remaining time is consumed by the preparation phases of the scanner, and is spent with planning sequences and the eventual repositioning of the coil and/or pregnant woman. These data may help to more accurately estimate the exposure to radiofrequency deposition and noise during fetal MRI studies.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21345632     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  8 in total

1.  Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: exposure times and functional outcomes at preschool age.

Authors:  Marine Bouyssi-Kobar; Adré J du Plessis; Richard L Robertson; Catherine Limperopoulos
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-07-09

2.  MR venography of the fetal brain using susceptibility weighted imaging.

Authors:  Jaladhar Neelavalli; Swati Mody; Lami Yeo; Pavan Kumar Jella; Steven J Korzeniewski; Sheena Saleem; Yashwanth Katkuri; Ray O Bahado-Singh; Sonia S Hassan; E Mark Haacke; Roberto Romero; Moriah E Thomason
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  [Indications and technique of fetal magnetic resonance imaging].

Authors:  U Asenbaum; P C Brugger; R Woitek; J Furtner; D Prayer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Pregnant women models analyzed for RF exposure and temperature increase in 3T RF shimmed birdcages.

Authors:  Manuel Murbach; Esra Neufeld; Theodoros Samaras; Juan Córcoles; Fraser J Robb; Wolfgang Kainz; Niels Kuster
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  MR imaging of the fetal brain at 1.5T and 3.0T field strengths: comparing specific absorption rate (SAR) and image quality.

Authors:  Uday Krishnamurthy; Jaladhar Neelavalli; Swati Mody; Lami Yeo; Pavan K Jella; Sheena Saleem; Steven J Korzeniewski; Maria D Cabrera; Shadi Ehterami; Ray O Bahado-Singh; Yashwanth Katkuri; Ewart M Haacke; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.901

Review 6.  [Fetal magnetic resonance imaging].

Authors:  W Reith; A Haussmann; U Yilmaz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Stress matters! Psychophysiological and emotional loadings of pregnant women undergoing fetal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Birgit Derntl; Jacqueline Krajnik; Kathrin Kollndorfer; Manfred Bijak; Ursula Nemec; Katharina Leithner; Daniela Prayer; Veronika Schöpf
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Fetal eye movements on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ramona Woitek; Gregor Kasprian; Christian Lindner; Fritz Stuhr; Michael Weber; Veronika Schöpf; Peter C Brugger; Ulrika Asenbaum; Julia Furtner; Dieter Bettelheim; Rainer Seidl; Daniela Prayer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.