Literature DB >> 21345519

[Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: evaluation of functional and oncological results].

A Treiyer1, M Saar, B Kopper, J Kamradt, S Siemer, M Stöckle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: radical cystectomy remains the most effective treatment for patients with localized, invasive bladder cancer and recurrent noninvasive disease. We report our experience with 84 consecutive cases of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy with regard to perioperative results, pathological outcomes and surgical complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: a total of 84 consecutive patients (70 male and 14 female) underwent robotic radical cystectomy and urinary diversion at our institution from January 2007 to August 2010 for clinically localized bladder cancer. Outcome measures evaluated included operative variables, hospital recovery, pathological outcomes and complication rate.
RESULTS: mean age of this cohort was 65.5 years (range 28 to 82). Of the patients 62 underwent ileal conduit diversion, 22 received a neobladder. Mean operating room time for all patients was 261min. (range: 243-618min.) and mean surgical blood loss was 298ml (range: 50-2000ml). 29% of the cases were pT1 or less disease, 38% were pT2, 26% and 7% were pT3 and T4 disease respectively, 15% were node positive. Mean number of lymph nodes removed was 15 (range 1 to 33). In 2 cases (2.4%) there was a positive surgical margin. Mean days to flatus were 2.12, bowel movement 2.87 and discharge home 17.7 (range: 10-33). There were 45 postoperative complications with 11.9% having a major complication (Clavien grade 3 or higher). At a mean followup of 16.7 months 10 patients (11%) had disease recurrence and 2 died of disease.
CONCLUSIONS: our experience with robotic radical cystectomy for the treatment of bladder cancer suggests that in proper hands this procedure provides acceptable surgical and pathological outcomes.
Copyright © 2010 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21345519     DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2010.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Actas Urol Esp        ISSN: 0210-4806            Impact factor:   0.994


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: do we actually need a robot?].

Authors:  G Niegisch; P Albers; R Rabenalt
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Current trends in minimally invasive reconstructive urology.

Authors:  I Belibasakis; G Kolostoumpis; K Makrygiannaki
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-11-05

Review 3.  Prevention and management of complications following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: lessons learned after >250 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Angela B Smith; Michael E Woods; Mathew C Raynor; Matthew E Nielsen; Eric M Wallen; Raj S Pruthi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Comparison beetwen open and laparoscopic radical cistectomy in a Latin American reference center: perioperative and oncological results.

Authors:  Marcos Tobias-Machado; Danniel Frade Said; Anuar Ibrahim Mitre; Alexandre Pompeo; Antonio Carlos Lima Pompeo
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.