Literature DB >> 21345481

Factors affecting the growth rates of ammonium and nitrite oxidizing bacteria.

Giulio Munz1, Claudio Lubello, Jan A Oleszkiewicz.   

Abstract

The maximum specific growth rates of both ammonium oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB) were investigated under varying aerobic solids retention time (SRT(a)) and in the presence/absence of anoxic (alternating) conditions. Two bench SBRs, reactor R1 and R2, were run in parallel for 150d. Reactor R1 was operated in aerobic conditions while R2 operated in alternating anoxic/aerobic conditions. The feed (synthetic wastewater), temperature, hydraulic retention time and mixing were identical in both reactors. The SRT(a) in both reactors was, sequentially, set at four values: 5, 4, 3 and 2d. Kinetic tests with the biomasses from both reactors were carried out to estimate the maximum specific growth rates (μ(max)) at each tested SRT(a) and decay rates, in both aerobic and anoxic conditions. The kinetic parameters of nitrifier were estimated through the calibration of a two step nitrification-denitrification activated sludge model. The results point to a slightly higher μ(max,AOB) and μ(max,NOB) in alternating conditions, while both μ(max,AOB) and μ(max,NOB) were shown not to vary in the tested range of SRT(a) (from 2 to 5d) at 20°C. They were relatively high when compared to literature data: 1.05d(-1)<μ(max,AOB)<1.4d(-1) and 0.91d(-1)<μ(max,NOB)<1.31d(-1). The decay coefficients of both AOB and NOB were much higher in aerobic (from 0.22d(-1) to 0.28d(-1)) than in anoxic (0.04d(-1) to 0.16d(-1)) conditions both in R1 and R2, which explained the higher nitrification rates observed in the alternating reactor.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21345481     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.01.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  7 in total

1.  Prolonged starvation and subsequent recovery of nitrification process in a simulated photovoltaic aeration SBR.

Authors:  Fangshu Ma; Anding Li; Boyin Li; Zhibo Cui; Chunhong Shi; Beihai Zhou
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Engineering application of anaerobic ammonium oxidation process in wastewater treatment.

Authors:  Nianjia Mao; Hongqiang Ren; Jinju Geng; Lili Ding; Ke Xu
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Biomass production from electricity using ammonia as an electron carrier in a reverse microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  Wendell O Khunjar; Asli Sahin; Alan C West; Kartik Chandran; Scott Banta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Multivariate statistical assessment of a polluted river under nitrification inhibition in the tropics.

Authors:  Thi Thu Huyen Le; Stephanie Zeunert; Malte Lorenz; Günter Meon
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Analysis of rapid culture of high-efficiency nitrifying bacteria and immobilized filler application for the treatment of municipal wastewater.

Authors:  Shaolun Wang; Hong Yang; Fan Zhang; Yakun Zhou; Jiawei Wang; Zongyue Liu; Yang Su
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  Nitrogen removal over nitrite by aeration control in aerobic granular sludge sequencing batch reactors.

Authors:  Samuel Lochmatter; Julien Maillard; Christof Holliger
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Effect of Free Ammonia, Free Nitrous Acid, and Alkalinity on the Partial Nitrification of Pretreated Pig Slurry, Using an Alternating Oxic/Anoxic SBR.

Authors:  Marisol Belmonte; Chia-Fang Hsieh; José Luis Campos; Lorna Guerrero; Ramón Méndez; Anuska Mosquera-Corral; Gladys Vidal
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.