Literature DB >> 21344890

Differential uptake of functionalized polystyrene nanoparticles by human macrophages and a monocytic cell line.

Oleg Lunov1, Tatiana Syrovets, Cornelia Loos, Johanna Beil, Michael Delacher, Kyrylo Tron, G Ulrich Nienhaus, Anna Musyanovych, Volker Mailänder, Katharina Landfester, Thomas Simmet.   

Abstract

Tumor cell lines are often used as models for the study of nanoparticle-cell interactions. Here we demonstrate that carboxy (PS-COOH) and amino functionalized (PS-NH2) polystyrene nanoparticles of ∼100 nm in diameter are internalized by human macrophages, by undifferentiated and by PMA-differentiated monocytic THP-1 cells via diverse mechanisms. The uptake mechanisms also differed for all cell types and particles when analyzed either in buffer or in medium containing human serum. Macrophages internalized ∼4 times more PS-COOH than THP-1 cells, when analyzed in serum-containing medium. By contrast, in either medium, THP-1 cells internalized PS-NH2 more rapidly than macrophages. Using pharmacological and antisense in vitro knockdown approaches, we showed that, in the presence of serum, the specific interaction between the CD64 receptor and the particles determines the macrophage uptake of particles by phagocytosis, whereas particle internalization in THP-1 cells occurred via dynamin II-dependent endocytosis. PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells differed in their uptake mechanism from macrophages and undifferentiated THP-1 cells by internalizing the particles via macropinocytosis. In line with our in vitro data, more intravenously applied PS-COOH particles accumulated in the liver, where macrophages of the reticuloendothelial system reside. By contrast, PS-NH2 particles were preferentially targeted to tumor xenografts grown on the chorioallantoic membrane of fertilized chicken eggs. Our data show that the amount of internalized nanoparticles, the uptake kinetics, and its mechanism may differ considerably between primary cells and a related tumor cell line, whether differentiated or not, and that particle uptake by these cells is critically dependent on particle opsonization by serum proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21344890     DOI: 10.1021/nn2000756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Nano        ISSN: 1936-0851            Impact factor:   15.881


  117 in total

1.  Blood-nanoparticle interactions and in vivo biodistribution: impact of surface PEG and ligand properties.

Authors:  Neha B Shah; Gregory M Vercellotti; James G White; Adrian Fegan; Carston R Wagner; John C Bischof
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Nanoparticle surface charge mediates the cellular receptors used by protein-nanoparticle complexes.

Authors:  Candace C Fleischer; Christine K Payne
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 3.  Drug carrier interaction with blood: a critical aspect for high-efficient vascular-targeted drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Daniel J Sobczynski; Margaret B Fish; Catherine A Fromen; Mariana Carasco-Teja; Rhima M Coleman; Omolola Eniola-Adefeso
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2015-08-14

4.  Cellular mechanism of fibril formation from serum amyloid A1 protein.

Authors:  Stephanie Claus; Katrin Meinhardt; Tobias Aumüller; Ioana Puscalau-Girtu; Julia Linder; Christian Haupt; Paul Walther; Tatiana Syrovets; Thomas Simmet; Marcus Fändrich
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Biodistribution and clearance of a filamentous plant virus in healthy and tumor-bearing mice.

Authors:  Sourabh Shukla; Amy M Wen; Nadia R Ayat; Ulrich Commandeur; Ramamurthy Gopalkrishnan; Ann-Marie Broome; Kristen W Lozada; Ruth A Keri; Nicole F Steinmetz
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 5.307

6.  Rapid formation of plasma protein corona critically affects nanoparticle pathophysiology.

Authors:  Stefan Tenzer; Dominic Docter; Jörg Kuharev; Anna Musyanovych; Verena Fetz; Rouven Hecht; Florian Schlenk; Dagmar Fischer; Klytaimnistra Kiouptsi; Christoph Reinhardt; Katharina Landfester; Hansjörg Schild; Michael Maskos; Shirley K Knauer; Roland H Stauber
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 39.213

Review 7.  Exploiting endocytosis for nanomedicines.

Authors:  Akin Akinc; Giuseppe Battaglia
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 10.005

8.  BSA modification to reduce CTAB induced nonspecificity and cytotoxicity of aptamer-conjugated gold nanorods.

Authors:  Emir Yasun; Chunmei Li; Inci Barut; Denisse Janvier; Liping Qiu; Cheng Cui; Weihong Tan
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 7.790

9.  Polymer Electrochromism Driven by Metabolic Activity Facilitates Rapid and Facile Bacterial Detection and Susceptibility Evaluation.

Authors:  Jiayingzi Wu; Yifan Zhu; Liyan You; Pu-Ting Dong; Jianguo Mei; Ji-Xin Cheng
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 18.808

10.  Toxicological evaluation of dextran stabilized iron oxide nanoparticles in human peripheral blood lymphocytes.

Authors:  Sheeja Liza Easo; Parayanthala Valappil Mohanan
Journal:  Biointerphases       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.456

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.