| Literature DB >> 21343888 |
Abstract
NovelEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21343888 PMCID: PMC6259914 DOI: 10.3390/molecules16021834
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1substituted pyrazoles with potential antitumor activity.
Scheme 1Synthesis of 3-[E-3-(N,N-dimethylamino)acryloyl]-4-(4-nitrophenyl)-1-aryl-1H-pyrazoles (2a,b).
Scheme 2Reactions of enaminones 2a,b with active methylene compounds.
Scheme 3Reactions of enaminones 2a,b with hydrazine hydrate and hydroxylamine.
Scheme 4Reactions of enaminones 2a,b with heterocyclic amines.
Scheme 5Reactions of enaminone 2a with pyrimidinethione.
Figure 213C NMR for azolopyrimidinones.
Figure 3Effect of conc. of 2b on MCF-7 line.
Figure 4Effect of conc. of 14a on MCF-7 line.
Figure 5Effect of conc. of 17 on MCF-7 line.
Figure 6Effect of conc. of 5-fluorouracil (standard) on MCF-7 line.
Figure 7Effect of conc. of 2b on HEPG2 line.
Figure 8Effect of conc. of 14a on HEPG2 line.
Figure 9Effect of conc. of 17 on HEPG2 line.
Figure 10Effect of conc. of 5-fluorouracil (standard) on HEPG2 line.
Antimicrobial activity of products 2a, 2b, 5b, and 5c.
| (Sample) | 2a (mg/mL) | 2b (mg/mL) | 5b (mg/mL) | 5c (mg/mL) | Standard* | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Chloramphenicol was used as a standard antibacterial agent while, Terbinafine was used as a standard antifungal agent.
Antimicrobial activity of products 8b, 9b, 12b, and 14a.
| (Sample) | 8b (mg/mL) | 9b (mg/mL) | 12b (mg/mL) | 14a (mg/mL) | Standard* | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Chloramphenicol was used as a standard antibacterial agent while, Terbinafine was used as a standard antifungal agent.
Antimicrobial activity of products 21a and 21b.
| (Sample) | 21a (mg/mL) | 21b (mg/mL) | Standard* | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Chloramphenicol was used as a standard antibacterial agent while, Terbinafine was used as a standard antifungal agent.