Literature DB >> 21342476

The Cochrane Collaboration: international activity within Cochrane Review Groups in the first decade of the twenty-first century.

Claire Allen1, Kiley Richmond.   

Abstract

The Cochrane Collaboration (http://www.cochrane.org) is the world's largest organisation dedicated to preparing, maintaining and promoting the accessibility of systematic reviews of the effects of healthcare interventions. It is an international organisation with participants in more than 100 countries, principally focused around the Cochrane Review Groups that are responsible for the preparation and maintenance of Cochrane reviews. Since 2000, a periodic audit has been done to count the number of active members in the Cochrane Review Groups, subdivided by the countries in which these people are based. At the beginning of 2010, there were almost 28,000 people involved, an increase from about 5500 in 2000. The growth of activity has been dramatic, and especially large for authors of Cochrane reviews and protocols. In the year 2000, 2840 people were listed as authors by the Cochrane Review Groups. At the beginning of 2010, this had risen to over 21,000 people.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd and Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21342476     DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-5391.2011.01109.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evid Based Med        ISSN: 1756-5391


  10 in total

1.  Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Eye and Vision Group Reviews.

Authors:  Michael Mimouni; Francis Mimouni; Fani Segev
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-06-16

2.  Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan Davey; Rebecca M Turner; Mike J Clarke; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  History of evidence synthesis to assess treatment effects: Personal reflections on something that is very much alive.

Authors:  Mike Clarke
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  DEALING WITH DISASTER DATABASES - WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM HEALTH AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS?: Application in practice.

Authors:  Ishani Kar-Purkayastha; Mike Clarke; Virginia Murray
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2011-09-30

5.  Cochrane methods--twenty years experience in developing systematic review methods.

Authors:  Jackie Chandler; Sally Hopewell
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2013-09-20

6.  The benefits of systematic mapping to evidence-based environmental management.

Authors:  Neal R Haddaway; Claes Bernes; Bengt-Gunnar Jonsson; Katarina Hedlund
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 5.129

7.  McMaster Optimal Aging Portal: an evidence-based database for geriatrics-focused health professionals.

Authors:  Angela M Barbara; Maureen Dobbins; R Brian Haynes; Alfonso Iorio; John N Lavis; Parminder Raina; Anthony J Levinson
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-07-11

8.  Systematic Reviews: Challenges for Their Justification, Related Comprehensive Searches, and Implications.

Authors:  Durga Prasanna Misra; Vikas Agarwal
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Prioritization of themes and research questions for health outcomes in natural disasters, humanitarian crises or other major healthcare emergencies.

Authors:  E A P S G Evidence Aid Priority Setting Group
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2013-10-16

10.  Summary of Findings Tables: Presenting the Main Findings of Cochrane Complementary and Alternative Medicine-related Reviews in a Transparent and Simple Tabular Format.

Authors:  Eric Manheimer
Journal:  Glob Adv Health Med       Date:  2012-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.