Hyun Soo Oh1, Wha Sook Seo. 1. Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fatigue is one of the most common problems experienced by cancer patients. The factors most frequently reported to correlate with cancer-related fatigue are symptom distress (pain, nausea/vomiting, dyspnea, and lack of appetite) and psychological distress (depression and anxiety). AIMS: This study was performed to examine the overall association of symptom and psychological distress with cancer-related fatigue using systematic literature review and meta-analysis. This study also aimed to determine which factors have a higher correlation with fatigue, and therefore should receive nursing priority. METHODS: A meta-analysis of 30 primary studies identified by searching computer databases, which included MEDLINE, PubMed, and CINAHL. RESULTS: Results showed that all symptoms (pain, dyspnea, nausea/vomiting, and lack of appetite) and psychological distress (depression and anxiety) included had a significant association with cancer-related fatigue with medium-to-large effect sizes, which were estimated using correlation coefficients. The overall correlations of psychological distress with cancer-related fatigue were found to be higher than those of symptom distress. The correlation of nausea/vomiting with cancer-related fatigue was higher than those of pain and dyspnea. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our findings highlight the importance of psychological distress in dealing with cancer-related fatigue in addition to the need to be attentive to a patient's symptom distress. Of the symptom distress, nausea/vomiting should be prioritized by nurses when managing cancer-related fatigue. This study provides sound empirical evidence that can be used to draft guidelines for the management of cancer-related fatigue.
BACKGROUND:Fatigue is one of the most common problems experienced by cancerpatients. The factors most frequently reported to correlate with cancer-related fatigue are symptom distress (pain, nausea/vomiting, dyspnea, and lack of appetite) and psychological distress (depression and anxiety). AIMS: This study was performed to examine the overall association of symptom and psychological distress with cancer-related fatigue using systematic literature review and meta-analysis. This study also aimed to determine which factors have a higher correlation with fatigue, and therefore should receive nursing priority. METHODS: A meta-analysis of 30 primary studies identified by searching computer databases, which included MEDLINE, PubMed, and CINAHL. RESULTS: Results showed that all symptoms (pain, dyspnea, nausea/vomiting, and lack of appetite) and psychological distress (depression and anxiety) included had a significant association with cancer-related fatigue with medium-to-large effect sizes, which were estimated using correlation coefficients. The overall correlations of psychological distress with cancer-related fatigue were found to be higher than those of symptom distress. The correlation of nausea/vomiting with cancer-related fatigue was higher than those of pain and dyspnea. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our findings highlight the importance of psychological distress in dealing with cancer-related fatigue in addition to the need to be attentive to a patient's symptom distress. Of the symptom distress, nausea/vomiting should be prioritized by nurses when managing cancer-related fatigue. This study provides sound empirical evidence that can be used to draft guidelines for the management of cancer-related fatigue.
Authors: Jennifer M Jones; Karin Olson; Pamela Catton; Charles N Catton; Neil E Fleshner; Monika K Krzyzanowska; David R McCready; Rebecca K S Wong; Haiyan Jiang; Doris Howell Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Paul Posadzki; Tae-Woong Moon; Tae-Young Choi; Tae-Yong Park; Myeong Soo Lee; Edzard Ernst Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-02-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Andrea M Barsevick; Michael R Irwin; Pamela Hinds; Andrew Miller; Ann Berger; Paul Jacobsen; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Bryce B Reeve; Karen Mustian; Ann O'Mara; Jin-Shei Lai; Michael Fisch; David Cella Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Ellen Krueger; Ekin Secinti; Catherine E Mosher; Patrick V Stutz; Andrea A Cohee; Shelley A Johns Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2021 Nov-Dec 01 Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: Brooke Y Kauffman; Kara Manning; Andrew H Rogers; Lorra Garey; Matthew W Gallagher; Andres G Viana; Michael J Zvolensky Journal: Cognit Ther Res Date: 2020-06-16