Literature DB >> 21342362

Normative values and inter-observer agreement for liquid and solid bolus swallows in upright and supine positions as assessed by esophageal high-resolution manometry.

R Sweis1, A Anggiansah, T Wong, E Kaufman, S Obrecht, M Fox.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-resolution manometry (HRM) with spatiotemporal representation of pressure data is a recent advance in esophageal measurement. At present, normal values are available for 5mL water swallows in the supine position. This study provides reference values for liquid and solid bolus swallows in the upright seated and supine positions.
METHODS: A total of 23 asymptomatic volunteers (11M:12F, age 20-56) underwent HRM (Manoscan 360; Sierra Scientific Instruments) with 5mL water and 1cm3 bread swallows in the upright and supine positions. Normal values for primary parameters associated with effective bolus transport [proximal transition zone length (PTZ, assesses peristaltic coordination], contraction front velocity (CFV), distal contractile index (DCI) and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP)] are presented. For each parameter, median values along with the 5-95th percentile range are reported. Inter-observer agreement between independent observers is reported using the intra-class correlation coefficient. KEY
RESULTS: A higher proportion of swallows were peristaltic for liquids than solids in both the upright and supine positions (both P<0.05). As workload increases with solid bolus and on moving from the upright to the supine position the esophageal contractile response resulted in a shorter PTZ, a slower CFV, and a more vigorous DCI. Also IRP increased during solid bolus transit (all P<0.01). There was significant agreement between independent observers for HRM parameters. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Normative values for esophageal function for solids as well as liquids and in the 'physiologic', upright position will optimize the utility of HRM studies. The high level of inter-observer agreement indicates that these can be applied as reference values in clinical practice.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21342362     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01682.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  50 in total

1.  Interobserver variability in esophageal body measurements with high-resolution manometry among new physician users.

Authors:  Erick Raj Singh; Christopher Rife; Steven Clayton; Peter Naas; Paul Nietert; Donald O Castell
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.062

2.  Comparison of two high-resolution manometry software systems in evaluating esophageal motor function.

Authors:  A Rengarajan; J Drapekin; A Patel; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Impact of thoracic surgery on esophageal motor function-Evaluation by high resolution manometry.

Authors:  Anja Wäsche; Arne Kandulski; Peter Malfertheiner; Sandra Riedel; Patrick Zardo; Thomas Hachenberg; Jens Schreiber
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  The Chicago Classification 3.0 Results in More Normal Findings and Fewer Hypotensive Findings With No Difference in Other Diagnoses.

Authors:  H Monrroy; D Cisternas; C Bilder; A Ditaranto; J Remes-Troche; A Meixueiro; M A Zavala; J Serra; I Marín; A Ruiz de León; J Pérez de la Serna; A Hani; A Leguizamo; L Abrahao; R Coello; M A Valdovinos
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Applications and Limits in Adults and Pediatric Patients with Esophageal Symptoms.

Authors:  Kornilia Nikaki; Joanne Li Shen Ooi; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-11

Review 6.  Utility of Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry in Clinical Practice: First, Do HRM.

Authors:  Ishita Dhawan; Brendon O'Connell; Amit Patel; Ron Schey; Henry P Parkman; Frank Friedenberg
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Esophageal Pressure Topography vs. Conventional Line Tracing.

Authors:  Dustin A Carlson; Karthik Ravi; Peter J Kahrilas; C Prakash Gyawali; Arjan J Bredenoord; Donald O Castell; Stuart J Spechler; Magnus Halland; Navya Kanuri; David A Katzka; Cadman L Leggett; Sabine Roman; Jose B Saenz; Gregory S Sayuk; Alan C Wong; Rena Yadlapati; Jody D Ciolino; Mark R Fox; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 8.  Achalasia: It Is Not All Black and White.

Authors:  Santosh Sanagapalli; Rami Sweis
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-06

9.  Treatment implications of high-resolution manometry findings: options for patients with esophageal dysmotility.

Authors:  Ahmed Bolkhir; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03

10.  Upright Integrated Relaxation Pressure Facilitates Characterization of Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction.

Authors:  Joseph R Triggs; Dustin A Carlson; Claire Beveridge; Anand Jain; Michael Y Tye; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.