Literature DB >> 21342202

How do bryophytes govern generative recruitment of vascular plants?

Nadejda A Soudzilovskaia1, Bente J Graae2, Jacob C Douma1, Oriol Grau3, Ann Milbau4, Anna Shevtsova5, Loes Wolters1, Johannes H C Cornelissen1.   

Abstract

Interactions between vascular plants and bryophytes determine plant community composition in many ecosystems. Yet, little is known about the importance of interspecific differences between bryophytes with respect to their effects on vascular plants. We compared the extent to which species-specific bryophyte effects on vascular plant generative recruitment depend on the following underlying mechanisms: allelopathy, mechanical obstruction, soil moisture and temperature control. We sowed 10 vascular plant species into monospecific mats of six chemically and structurally diverse bryophytes, and examined 1-yr seedling recruitment. Allelopathic effects were also assessed in a laboratory phyto-assay. Although all bryophytes suppressed vascular plant regeneration, there were significant differences between the bryophyte species. The lack of interactions indicated the absence of species-specific adaptations of vascular plants for recruitment in bryophyte mats. Differences between bryophyte species were best explained by alterations in temperature regime under bryophyte mats, mostly by reduced temperature amplitudes during germination. The temperature regime under bryophyte mats was well predicted by species-specific bryophyte cushion thickness. The fitness of established seedlings was not affected by the presence of bryophytes. Our results suggest that climatically or anthropogenically driven changes in the species' composition of bryophyte communities have knock-on effects on vascular plant populations via generative reproduction.
© 2011 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2011 New Phytologist Trust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21342202     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03644.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  13 in total

1.  Rethinking climate context dependencies in biological terms.

Authors:  Jonathan Lenoir
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Predicted changes in vegetation structure affect the susceptibility to invasion of bryophyte-dominated subarctic heath.

Authors:  R Lutz Eckstein; Eva Pereira; Ann Milbau; Bente Jessen Graae
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Sphagnum Species Modulate their Phenolic Profiles and Mycorrhizal Colonization of Surrounding Andromeda polifolia along Peatland Microhabitats.

Authors:  Geneviève Chiapusio; Vincent E J Jassey; Floriant Bellvert; Gilles Comte; Leslie A Weston; Frederic Delarue; Alexandre Buttler; Marie Laure Toussaint; Philippe Binet
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Moss Mediates the Influence of Shrub Species on Soil Properties and Processes in Alpine Tundra.

Authors:  C Guillermo Bueno; Scott N Williamson; Isabel C Barrio; Ágústa Helgadóttir; David S HiK
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Temperature impact on the influence of penguin-derived nutrients and mosses on non-native grass in a simulated polar ecosystem.

Authors:  Stef Bokhorst; Peter Convey; Richard van Logtestijn; Rien Aerts
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 13.211

6.  Plant-plant interactions change during succession on nurse logs in a northern temperate rainforest.

Authors:  Carrie L Woods; Katy Maleta; Kimmy Ortmann
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Impacts of different climate change regimes and extreme climatic events on an alpine meadow community.

Authors:  Juha M Alatalo; Annika K Jägerbrand; Ulf Molau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Both seed germination and seedling mortality increase with experimental warming and fertilization in a subarctic tundra.

Authors:  Ann Milbau; Nicolas Vandeplas; Fred Kockelbergh; Ivan Nijs
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.276

9.  Biotic rescaling reveals importance of species interactions for variation in biodiversity responses to climate change.

Authors:  Vigdis Vandvik; Olav Skarpaas; Kari Klanderud; Richard J Telford; Aud H Halbritter; Deborah E Goldberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Effects of plant functional group removal on CO2 fluxes and belowground C stocks across contrasting ecosystems.

Authors:  Roger Grau-Andrés; David A Wardle; Michael J Gundale; Claire N Foster; Paul Kardol
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 5.499

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.