Literature DB >> 21342187

The use of orthopedic surgical devices for forensic identification.

Rebecca J Wilson1, Jonathan D Bethard, Elizabeth A DiGangi.   

Abstract

Surgically implanted devices have become increasingly common in modern skeletal material. Therefore, having the knowledge of the variety of implanted orthopedic devices, their manufacturer, and where to find and how to use identifying numbers in such implants can assist in the identification process when traditional methods are not applicable. Orthopedic device manufacturers are required by the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990 and the FDA Modernization Act of 1997 to track permanently implanted devices. Manufacturer information on orthopedic devices associates the orthopedic surgeon who implanted the device with the patient. By providing a current list of the most common orthopedic device manufacturers in the U.S.A. and the associated contact information, investigators will have updated tools for the individuation process. Despite numerous complicating factors regarding how device data are tracked, the information presented here can assist forensic professionals with obtaining presumptive and/or positive identifications.
© 2011 American Academy of Forensic Sciences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21342187     DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01639.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.832


  7 in total

1.  [Orthopaedic implants. Application outside of patient care?].

Authors:  J Manhart; A Dietze; A Büttner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  The utilization of incinerated hip and knee prostheses for identification.

Authors:  John William Berketa; Ellie Simpson; Stephen Graves; Grace O'Donohue; Yen-Liang Liu
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 2.007

3.  Use of pacemaker programmers for disaster victim identification.

Authors:  Haruka Makinae; Norio Numata; Hirofumi Kitaoka; Masao Daimon; Taira Yamamoto; Atsushi Amano
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.007

4.  Cochlear implants in the forensic identification process.

Authors:  John Berketa; Helen James; Neil Langlois; Lindsay Richards
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.007

5.  Cardiac conduction devices in the radiologic comparative identification of decedents.

Authors:  Vasiliki Chatzaraki; Garyfalia Ampanozi; Michael J Thali; Wolf Schweitzer
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.007

6.  Human identification: a review of methods employed within an Australian coronial death investigation system.

Authors:  Soren Blau; Jeremy Graham; Lyndall Smythe; Samantha Rowbotham
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  The use of orthopedic surgical devices for forensic identification: A systematic review.

Authors:  Abrar H Bukhamseen; Abrar A Aldhameen; Nof T Alzayyat; Maria M Alqadeeb; Bashair K Alotaibi; Raghad I Aljohani; Ritesh G Menezes
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-07-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.