Alison M Stuebe1, Karen Bonuck. 1. Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. astuebe@med.unc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Maternal knowledge and comfort with breastfeeding affect prenatal feeding intentions, and these intentions are strong predictors of feeding outcomes. However, predictors of exclusive breastfeeding intention have not been well characterized. METHODS: We measured the association between intentions to exclusively breastfeed and knowledge of infant health benefits, feeding guidelines, and comfort related to breastfeeding in social settings. Participants were lower-income, ethnically diverse women in two randomized, controlled trials of breastfeeding support. We compared results with data from the national Infant Feeding Practices Study II. RESULTS: Among 883 women in our trials, exclusive breastfeeding, mixed feeding, and exclusive formula feeding intentions were 45.9%, 46.1%, and 8.0%, respectively. In multivariate-adjusted models, women who disagreed that "Infant formula is as good as breastmilk" were more likely to intend exclusive breastfeeding versus exclusive formula feeding (odds ratio 3.44, 95% confidence interval 1.80-6.59) compared with women who agreed with this statement. Increasing levels of agreement that breastfed infants were less likely to develop ear infections, respiratory infections, diarrhea, and obesity were positively associated with intentions to exclusively breastfeed (p for trend < 0.001 for all). Compared with the national sample, our study participants were more likely to agree with all of these statements. Women who felt comfortable breastfeeding in public intended to exclusive breastfeed for 0.84 month longer (95% confidence interval 0.41-1.28) than those who felt uncomfortable. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal knowledge about infant health benefits, as well as comfort with breastfeeding in social settings, was directly related to intention to exclusively breastfeed. Prenatal interventions that address these issues may increase exclusive breastfeeding intention and duration.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Maternal knowledge and comfort with breastfeeding affect prenatal feeding intentions, and these intentions are strong predictors of feeding outcomes. However, predictors of exclusive breastfeeding intention have not been well characterized. METHODS: We measured the association between intentions to exclusively breastfeed and knowledge of infant health benefits, feeding guidelines, and comfort related to breastfeeding in social settings. Participants were lower-income, ethnically diverse women in two randomized, controlled trials of breastfeeding support. We compared results with data from the national Infant Feeding Practices Study II. RESULTS: Among 883 women in our trials, exclusive breastfeeding, mixed feeding, and exclusive formula feeding intentions were 45.9%, 46.1%, and 8.0%, respectively. In multivariate-adjusted models, women who disagreed that "Infant formula is as good as breastmilk" were more likely to intend exclusive breastfeeding versus exclusive formula feeding (odds ratio 3.44, 95% confidence interval 1.80-6.59) compared with women who agreed with this statement. Increasing levels of agreement that breastfed infants were less likely to develop ear infections, respiratory infections, diarrhea, and obesity were positively associated with intentions to exclusively breastfeed (p for trend < 0.001 for all). Compared with the national sample, our study participants were more likely to agree with all of these statements. Women who felt comfortable breastfeeding in public intended to exclusive breastfeed for 0.84 month longer (95% confidence interval 0.41-1.28) than those who felt uncomfortable. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal knowledge about infant health benefits, as well as comfort with breastfeeding in social settings, was directly related to intention to exclusively breastfeed. Prenatal interventions that address these issues may increase exclusive breastfeeding intention and duration.
Authors: Lawrence M Gartner; Jane Morton; Ruth A Lawrence; Audrey J Naylor; Donna O'Hare; Richard J Schanler; Arthur I Eidelman Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Lori Feldman-Winter; Lauren Barone; Barry Milcarek; Krystal Hunter; Joan Meek; Jane Morton; Tara Williams; Audrey Naylor; Ruth A Lawrence Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-07-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Joan S Thomas; Elaine A Yu; Noor Tirmizi; Aatekah Owais; Sumon K Das; Shahed Rahman; A S G Faruque; Benjamin Schwartz; Aryeh D Stein Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2015-01
Authors: Rachel S Gross; Alan L Mendelsohn; Michelle B Gross; Roberta Scheinmann; Mary Jo Messito Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2016-02-06 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Adam K Lewkowitz; Julia D López; Richard I Stein; Janine S Rhoades; Rosa C Schulz; Candice L Woolfolk; George A Macones; Debra Haire-Joshu; Alison G Cahill Journal: Breastfeed Med Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: Kristin P Tully; Diane Holditch-Davis; Rosemary C White-Traut; Richard David; T Michael O'Shea; Victoria Geraldo Journal: J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs Date: 2015-11-25