| Literature DB >> 21340560 |
Olivier Dassonville1, Jean Claude Mérol, Alexandre Bozec, François Swierkosz, José Santini, André Chaïs, Pierre Yves Marcy, Paul Giacchero, Emmanuel Chamorey, Gilles Poissonnet.
Abstract
This study included 60 patients (30 in Nice and 30 in Reims), who were randomised between a control group that used no device of this type and a group equipped with the Provox HME®. After 3 months of using the device, a notable improvement was found which was statistically significant with regard to cough (P = 0.00174) and to bronchorrhoea (P = 0.0031), and very close to achieving significance with regard to breathing effort. An overall improvement in the prosthetic (tracheo-oesophageal) voice was found in the 21 patients using the HME® and a voice prosthesis for all of the parameters studied. The device was used daily by 80% of the patients of whom 42% used it day and night at the end of the 3 months. Seven patients suffered from minor cutaneous intolerance (of whom 6 had received radiation therapy), which did not require the use of the HME® to be abandoned (PC). After 3 months, patients were asked the following questions: "Do you feel any improvement?": 92% of affirmative answers; "Are you breathing better?": 88% of affirmative answers; "Are you speaking more easily?": 81% had experienced speech improvement. The general adaptation to the device was judged to be satisfactory for 95% of the patients after 3 months. The results of this randomised study show an improvement in the pulmonary symptoms and in the prosthetic voice after 3 months of using Provox HME®. This light and easy-to-use device appears to us to afford a significantly improved quality of life for laryngectomees and should be offered systematically during functional rehabilitation of these patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21340560 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-010-1474-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ISSN: 0937-4477 Impact factor: 2.503