Literature DB >> 21340545

Treatment policy for petroclival meningioma based on tumor size: aiming radical removal in small tumors for obtaining cure without morbidity.

Iwao Yamakami1, Yoshinori Higuchi, Kentaro Horiguchi, Naokatsu Saeki.   

Abstract

Aggressive tumor removal is not always the best treatment for petroclival meningioma (PCM). However, radical removal actually provides the cure with minimal morbidity. We evaluated the relation of surgical results and tumor size in the PCM removal to clarify the treatment policy for PCM. This study comprised 32 consecutive patients with newly-diagnosed PCM who underwent tumor removal; tumor size was small (< 3 cm) in 12 patients and large (≥3 cm) in 20. Tumor removal was classified into radical (Simpson's grade I/II) and non-radical (Simpson's grade III/IV). Removal of small PCM was 11 radical and one non-radical; no surgical morbidity/mortality occurred and postoperative regular follow-up using magnetic resonance imaging showed no recurrence in the period of 66±45 months. Removal of large PCM was eight radical and 12 non-radical; despite no mortality, the incidence of permanent cranial nerve deficits and major neurological deficits newly developed postoperatively was 35% and 25%, respectively. Radical removal was significantly more frequent in small PCMs than in large PCMs. Permanent cranial nerve deficits newly developed postoperatively and poor outcome (Karnofsky score ≤80) were significantly more frequent in large PCMs than in small PCMs. Radical removal of small PCM is achieved with minimal morbidity and results in the cure. Notwithstanding high morbidity, aggressive removal of large PCM does not achieve a high rate of radical removal. To find and remove PCM radically while it is small is the only way to cure the disease with minimal morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21340545     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-011-0308-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  35 in total

1.  [Transpetrosal approach].

Authors:  H Ohnishi
Journal:  No Shinkei Geka       Date:  1994-06

2.  Relative roles of microsurgery and stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of patients with cranial meningiomas: a single-surgeon 4-year integrated experience with both modalities.

Authors:  Mark E Linskey; Stephen A Davis; Vaneerat Ratanatharathorn
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Evaluation of fractionated radiotherapy and gamma knife radiosurgery in cavernous sinus meningiomas: treatment strategy.

Authors:  Philipe Metellus; Jean Regis; Xavier Muracciole; Stephane Fuentes; Henry Dufour; Isabelle Nanni; Oliver Chinot; Pierre-Marie Martin; Francois Grisoli
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Clivus meningiomas.

Authors:  M Cherington; S A Schneck
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 5.  Petroclival and foramen magnum meningiomas: surgical approaches and pitfalls.

Authors:  L N Sekhar; D C Wright; R Richardson; W Monacci
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Gamma knife radiosurgery of imaging-diagnosed intracranial meningioma.

Authors:  John C Flickinger; Douglas Kondziolka; Ann H Maitz; L Dade Lunsford
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Middle fossa transpetrosal-transtentorial approaches for petroclival meningiomas. Selective pyramid resection and radicality.

Authors:  T Kawase; R Shiobara; S Toya
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Petroclival meningiomas: multimodality treatment and outcomes at long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Sabareesh K Natarajan; Laligam N Sekhar; David Schessel; Akio Morita
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Surgical removal of small petroclival meningiomas.

Authors:  R Ramina; M C Neto; Y B Fernandes; E B Silva; T A Mattei; P H P Aguiar
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Experience with 36 surgical cases of petroclival meningiomas.

Authors:  M Samii; M Tatagiba
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.216

View more
  5 in total

1.  Management of petroclival meningiomas: a review of the development of current therapy.

Authors:  Adrian J Maurer; Sam Safavi-Abbasi; Ahmed A Cheema; Chad A Glenn; Michael E Sughrue
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2014-05-27

2.  Recurrent petroclival meningiomas: clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes.

Authors:  Da Li; Shu-Yu Hao; Liang Wang; Jie Tang; Xin-Ru Xiao; Gui-Jun Jia; Zhen Wu; Li-Wei Zhang; Jun-Ting Zhang
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Petroclival Meningiomas: Factors Determining the Choice of Approach.

Authors:  Gustavo Rassier Isolan; Sâmia Yasin Wayhs; Guilherme Alves Lepski; Leandro Infantini Dini; Joel Lavinsky
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-12-11

4.  Aggressive Progression of a WHO Grade I Meningioma of the Posterior Clinoid Process: An Illustration of the Risks Associated With Observation of Skull Base Meningiomas.

Authors:  Isabella M Young; Jacky Yeung; Chad Glenn; Charles Teo; Michael E Sughrue
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-03-19

5.  Drilling off the Petrosal Apex and Opening the Upper Wall of Meckel's Cave Are the Key Elements of Good Outcomes in the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia Secondary to Petrous Apex Meningioma.

Authors:  Jie Bai; Yufan Zhou; Gang Song; Jian Ren; Xinru Xiao
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2022-03-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.