Literature DB >> 21340378

Analysis of aortic root surgery with composite mechanical aortic valve conduit and valve-sparing reconstruction.

Ricardo Ribeiro Dias1, Omar Asdrubal Vilca Mejia, Alfredo Inácio Fiorelli, Pablo Maria Alberto Pomerantzeff, Altamiro Ribeiro Dias, Charles Mady, Noedir Antonio Groppo Stolf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Comparative analysis of early and late results of aortic root reconstruction with aortic valve sparing operations and the composite mechanical valve conduit replacement.
METHODS: From November 2002 to September 2009, 164 consecutive patients with mean age 54 ± 15 years, 115 male, underwent the aortic root reconstruction (125 mechanical valve conduit replacements and 39 valve sparing operations). Sixteen percent of patients had Marfan syndrome and 4.3% had bicuspid aortic valve. One hundred and forty-four patients (88%) were followed for a mean period of 41.1 ± 20.8 months.
RESULTS: The hospital mortality was 4.9%, 5.6% in operations with valved conduits and 2.6% in the valve sparing procedures (P <0.05). There was no difference neither in survival (95% CI = 86% - 96%, P= 0.1) nor in reoperation-free survival (95% CI = 85% - 90%, P = 0.29). The survival free of complications such as bleeding, thromboembolism and endocarditis were favorable to the valve sparing operations, respectively (95% CI = 70% - 95%, P = 0.001), (95% CI = 82% - 95% P = 0.03) and (95% CI = 81% - 95%, P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis showed that creatinine greater than 1.4 mg/dl, Cabrol operation and renal dialysis were predictors of mortality, respectively, with occurrence chance of 6 (95% CI = 1.8 - 19.5, P = 0.003), 12 (95% CI = 3 - 49.7, P = 0.0004) and 16 (95% CI = 3.6 - 71.3, P = 0.0002).
CONCLUSIONS: The aortic root reconstruction has a low early and late mortality, high survival free of complications and low need for reoperation. During the late follow-up, valve sparing aortic root reconstructions presented fewer incidences of bleeding, thromboembolic events and endocarditis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21340378     DOI: 10.1590/s0102-76382010000400012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc


  5 in total

1.  Initial Surgical Experience with Aortic Valve Repair: Clinical and Echocardiographic Results.

Authors:  Francisco Diniz Affonso da Costa; Daniele de Fátima Fornazari Colatusso; Ana Claudia Brenner Affonso da Costa; Eduardo Mendel Balbi Filho; Vinicius Nesi Cavicchioli; Sergio Augusto Veiga Lopes; Andrea Dumsch de Aragon Ferreira; Claudinei Collatusso
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-04

2.  Does aortic valve repair in valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction compromise the longevity of the procedure?

Authors:  Ricardo Ribeiro Dias; José Augusto Duncan; Fabrício José de Souza Dinato; Lucas Lacerda Araújo; Hugo Monteiro Neder Issa; Fábio Fernandes; Charles Mady; Fábio Biscegli Jatene
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 3.  A survey of recently published cardiovascular, hematological and pneumological original articles in the Brazilian scientific press.

Authors:  Kavita Kirankumar Patel; Bruno Caramelli; Ariane Gomes
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  Surgery of the aortic root: should we go for the valve-sparing root reconstruction or the composite graft-valve replacement is still the first choice of treatment for these patients?

Authors:  Fernando de Azevedo Lamana; Ricardo Ribeiro Dias; Jose Augusto Duncan; Leandro Batisti de Faria; Luiz Marcelo Sa Malbouisson; Luciano de Figueiredo Borges; Charles Mady; Fábio Biscegli Jatene
Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

5.  Brazilian Single-Center Experience with Aortic Root Replacement in 448 Patients: What Is the Best Technique?

Authors:  Fabrício José Dinato; Ricardo Ribeiro Dias; José Augusto Duncan; Fábio Fernandes; Felix José Alvares Ramirez; Charles Mady; Fabio B Jatene
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-12-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.