PURPOSE: To investigate the sensitivity to secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe) in preteens aged 8-13 years who have never smoked, and to determine whether it predicts smoking susceptibility. METHODS: We assessed the sensitivity to SHSe using reactions commonly used for the assessment of sensitivity to the first-smoked cigarette (e.g., feeling dizzy), and investigated the factor structure of these reactions for the purpose of data reduction. We examined the association of each reaction measure and summary score with demographic characteristics and smoking susceptibility, using logistic regression and ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: One factor was identified that captured the physical and/or unpleasant reactions. Older preteens and preteens with more highly educated parents reported fewer reactions to SHSe. More African American preteens reported feeling relaxed or calm compared with all other racial/ethnic groups. Experiencing physical and/or unpleasant reactions to SHSe predicted lower risk for smoking susceptibility. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first study to extend analytical methodology for sensitivity to active smoking to sensitivity to SHSe in youth who had never smoked. Results suggest a desensitization process with age and lower sensitivity to some reactions in preteens from more highly educated households. Preteens who have more aversive experiences with SHSe tend to be less susceptible to smoking than those who experience fewer aversive reactions. Assessment of sensitivity to SHSe is a novel approach to the study of cigarette use etiology and may contribute to better prediction of smoking initiation.
PURPOSE: To investigate the sensitivity to secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe) in preteens aged 8-13 years who have never smoked, and to determine whether it predicts smoking susceptibility. METHODS: We assessed the sensitivity to SHSe using reactions commonly used for the assessment of sensitivity to the first-smoked cigarette (e.g., feeling dizzy), and investigated the factor structure of these reactions for the purpose of data reduction. We examined the association of each reaction measure and summary score with demographic characteristics and smoking susceptibility, using logistic regression and ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: One factor was identified that captured the physical and/or unpleasant reactions. Older preteens and preteens with more highly educated parents reported fewer reactions to SHSe. More African American preteens reported feeling relaxed or calm compared with all other racial/ethnic groups. Experiencing physical and/or unpleasant reactions to SHSe predicted lower risk for smoking susceptibility. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first study to extend analytical methodology for sensitivity to active smoking to sensitivity to SHSe in youth who had never smoked. Results suggest a desensitization process with age and lower sensitivity to some reactions in preteens from more highly educated households. Preteens who have more aversive experiences with SHSe tend to be less susceptible to smoking than those who experience fewer aversive reactions. Assessment of sensitivity to SHSe is a novel approach to the study of cigarette use etiology and may contribute to better prediction of smoking initiation.
Authors: Ellen R Gritz; Alexander V Prokhorov; Karen Suchanek Hudmon; Mary Mullin Jones; Carol Rosenblum; Chung-Chi Chang; Robert M Chamberlain; Wendell C Taylor; Dennis Johnston; Carl de Moor Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Xinguang Chen; Alan Stacy; Hong Zheng; Jianguo Shan; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Jennifer Unger; Jie Gong; Peggy Gallaher; Chunhong Liu; Stanley Azen; Sohaila Shakib; Anderson Johnson C Ph D Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Melbourne F Hovell; Susan B Meltzer; Dennis R Wahlgren; Georg E Matt; C Richard Hofstetter; Jennifer A Jones; Eli O Meltzer; J Thomas Bernert; James L Pirkle Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Nancy J Kaufman; Brian C Castrucci; Paul D Mowery; Karen K Gerlach; Seth Emont; C Tracy Orleans Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2002-06
Authors: Joseph R DiFranza; Judith A Savageau; Kenneth Fletcher; Judith K Ockene; Nancy A Rigotti; Ann D McNeill; Mardia Coleman; Constance Wood Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Melbourne F Hovell; Joy M Zakarian; Georg E Matt; Sandy Liles; Jennifer A Jones; C Richard Hofstetter; Sarah N Larson; Neal L Benowitz Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Avrum Spira; Jennifer Beane; Vishal Shah; Gang Liu; Frank Schembri; Xuemei Yang; John Palma; Jerome S Brody Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-06-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ding Ding; Dennis R Wahlgren; Sandy Liles; Georg E Matt; McKenzie Oliver; Jennifer A Jones; Melbourne F Hovell Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Christina N Lessov-Schlaggar; Dennis R Wahlgren; Sandy Liles; Ming Ji; Suzanne C Hughes; Jonathan P Winickoff; Jennifer A Jones; Gary E Swan; Melbourne F Hovell Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2011-07-11 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Melbourne F Hovell; John Bellettiere; Sandy Liles; Benjamin Nguyen; Vincent Berardi; Christine Johnson; Georg E Matt; John Malone; Marie C Boman-Davis; Penelope J E Quintana; Saori Obayashi; Dale Chatfield; Robert Robinson; Elaine J Blumberg; Weg M Ongkeko; Neil E Klepeis; Suzanne C Hughes Journal: Tob Control Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Ding Ding; Dennis R Wahlgren; Sandy Liles; Jennifer A Jones; Suzanne C Hughes; Melbourne F Hovell Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2010-06-22 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Geetha Raghuveer; David A White; Laura L Hayman; Jessica G Woo; Juan Villafane; David Celermajer; Kenneth D Ward; Sarah D de Ferranti; Justin Zachariah Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jian Jiu Chen; Sai Yin Ho; Wing Man Au; Man Ping Wang; Tai Hing Lam Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-11-13 Impact factor: 3.390