Literature DB >> 21337616

Evidence-based policy on dietary calcium and vitamin D.

Ian R Reid1, Alison Avenell.   

Abstract

The Institute of Medicine's report on calcium and vitamin D makes a positive contribution by grounding its recommendations on the available evidence base. The committee does not substantially change recommended dietary intakes for calcium and modestly increases those for vitamin D based on the need for a median serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D of 40 nmol/L. They do not support the suggestion that all adults should have levels >75 nmol/L. The committee concludes that current evidence does not support nonskeletal benefits for vitamin D or calcium, and notes that higher intakes of both could have adverse health consequences. The present authors are generally in agreement with these conclusions, with some caveats regarding the evidence base used. However, we believe that the central role of sunlight exposure in determining vitamin D status needs to be explicitly reflected in public policy in this area.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21337616     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  3 in total

Review 1.  A dermatologist's perspective on vitamin D.

Authors:  Veena Vanchinathan; Henry W Lim
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  How important is vitamin D in preventing infections?

Authors:  P O Lang; N Samaras; D Samaras; R Aspinall
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Hypercalcemia in children receiving pharmacologic doses of vitamin D.

Authors:  Michelle B Vanstone; Sharon E Oberfield; Laurel Shader; Laleh Ardeshirpour; Thomas O Carpenter
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 7.124

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.