Literature DB >> 21337195

Influence of production system on the rate of onset of Campylobacter colonization in chicken flocks reared extensively in the United Kingdom.

V M Allen1, A M Ridley, J A Harris, D G Newell, L Powell.   

Abstract

1. Because thermophilic Campylobacter spp. are common in chicken flocks reared extensively, cross-sectional and longitudinal studies were carried out on organic and free-range farms to determine the onset of colonisation (lag phase) and likely sources of flock infection. 2. For 14 organic and 14 free range flocks, there was a difference in lag phases, with the former being colonized at a mean of 14·1 d in comparison with 31·6 d for the latter. Whereas most free-range flocks became colonized when released on to pasture, those reared organically were usually colonized at the housed brooding stage. 3. Further study of organic flocks on three farms over 7 successive crop cycles confirmed that colonisation was strongly influenced by the prevailing husbandry conditions and was not a consequence of the length of the rearing period. 4. Molecular epidemiological investigations on a farm showing the shortest lag phase, using PFGE typing with two different restriction enzymes (SmaI and KpnI) and flaA SVR sequence typing, revealed that potential sources of colonisation for organic chickens were already present on the farm at the time of chick placement. Such sources included the ante area of the brooding house, surrounding pasture and other livestock being kept on the farm. 5. Overall, the study demonstrated that, under UK conditions, the prevalence of colonisation was greater in extensive flocks (95-100%) than it was for conventional broilers (55%), similar to the situation in other countries, but all three management systems showed comparable levels of caecal carriage in positive birds (log(10)/g 6·2-6·7).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21337195     DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2010.537306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  11 in total

1.  On-farm Campylobacter and Escherichia coli in commercial broiler chickens: Re-used bedding does not influence Campylobacter emergence and levels across sequential farming cycles.

Authors:  H N Chinivasagam; W Estella; H Rodrigues; D G Mayer; C Weyand; T Tran; A Onysk; I Diallo
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Analysis of Campylobacter jejuni Subtype Distribution in the Chicken Broiler Production Continuum: a Longitudinal Examination To Identify Primary Contamination Points.

Authors:  G Douglas Inglis; Nahal Ramezani; Eduardo N Taboada; Valerie F Boras; Richard R E Uwiera
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Colonization of Campylobacter spp. in broiler chickens and laying hens reared in tropical climates with low-biosecurity housing.

Authors:  R S Kalupahana; K S A Kottawatta; K S T Kanankege; M A P van Bergen; P Abeynayake; J A Wagenaar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Estimating the time at which commercial broiler flocks in Great Britain become infected with Campylobacter: a Bayesian approach.

Authors:  A D Goddard; M E Arnold; V M Allen; E L Snary
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.434

5.  Weather correlates of Campylobacter prevalence in broilers at slaughter under tropical conditions in Sri Lanka.

Authors:  R S Kalupahana; L Mughini-Gras; S A Kottawatta; S Somarathne; C Gamage; J A Wagenaar
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 4.434

6.  Effect of Feed Additives on Productivity and Campylobacter spp. Loads in Broilers Reared under Free Range Conditions.

Authors:  Muriel Guyard-Nicodème; Adeline Huneau-Salaün; Fabrizio A Tatone; Fabien Skiba; Maxime Quentin; Ségolène Quesne; Typhaine Poezevara; Marianne Chemaly
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  TYPLEX® Chelate, a novel feed additive, inhibits Campylobacter jejuni biofilm formation and cecal colonization in broiler chickens.

Authors:  F Khattak; V Paschalis; M Green; J G M Houdijk; P Soultanas; J Mahdavi
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  A systematic review characterizing on-farm sources of Campylobacter spp. for broiler chickens.

Authors:  Agnes Agunos; Lisa Waddell; David Léger; Eduardo Taboada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cytokine responses in birds challenged with the human food-borne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni implies a Th17 response.

Authors:  William D K Reid; Andrew J Close; Suzanne Humphrey; Gemma Chaloner; Lizeth Lacharme-Lora; Lisa Rothwell; Pete Kaiser; Nicola J Williams; Tom J Humphrey; Paul Wigley; Stephen P Rushton
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Genotyping and molecular characterization of antimicrobial resistance in thermophilic Campylobacter isolated from poultry breeders and their progeny in Eastern Spain.

Authors:  C Marin; S Sevilla-Navarro; R Lonjedo; P Catalá-Gregori; M A Ferrús; S Vega; A Jiménez-Belenguer
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.