Literature DB >> 21336573

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in semisupine position: a modified approach for renal calculus.

Ke-Wei Xu1, Jian Huang, Zheng-Hui Guo, Tian-Xin Lin, Cai-Xai Zhang, Hao Liu, Jian Chun, You-Sheng Yao, Jin-Li Han, Hai Huang.   

Abstract

Conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is usually performed in a prone position, which compresses the thorax and results in difficulty in rescue during operation. When PCNL is performed in a supine position, the flank renal puncture area is limited, so it is difficult to treat disseminated and complex renal calculi. Herein, we introduce a modified semisupine position for performing PCNL, which has numerous benefits as well as safe and effective. Between May 2002 and May 2009, a total of 452 patients with renal calculi were treated with semisupine PCNL. The patient was placed in 45° semisupine position during the procedure, with the affected flank arched as much as possible. In this series, no one converted to open surgery. The average operating time was (115.2 ± 44.5) min. Single tract PCNL was performed for 80.97% of the cases, two tracts 13.94%, three tracts 4.65%, and four tracts 0.44%. The upper, middle, and lower calix tracts accounted for 12.1, 63.0, and 24.9%, of procedures, respectively. Stone-free rate was 85.7% overall, 92.2% for single calculus (83/90), and 72.9% for staghorn calculi (78/107). Major postoperative complications occurred in 3.3% of the cases. This study demonstrated PCNL in a semisupine position is an effective alternative for treating renal calculi, which combines the advantages of PCNL in a prone position, and PCNL in a supine position. The semisupine position allows easier irrigation of stone fragments, is more comfortable for the patient, and facilitates monitoring of anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21336573     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-011-0366-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  18 in total

1.  Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique.

Authors:  I Fernström; B Johansson
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1976

2.  Position: prone or supine is the issue of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Roberto Miano; Cesare Scoffone; Cosimo De Nunzio; Stefano Germani; Cecilia Cracco; Paolo Usai; Andrea Tubaro; Fernando J Kim; Salvatore Micali
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Effective approach to high-risk and morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  T Manohar; Prashant Jain; Mahesh Desai
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotripsy comparison with the prone standard technique.

Authors:  Siavash Falahatkar; Amin Afshari Moghaddam; Mohammad Salehi; Sara Nikpour; Fereshteh Esmaili; Negin Khaki
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 5.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone and prone-flexed positions: anatomic considerations.

Authors:  A Andrew Ray; Dae-Gyun Chung; R John D'A Honey
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  The prone positioning during general anesthesia minimally affects respiratory mechanics while improving functional residual capacity and increasing oxygen tension.

Authors:  P Pelosi; M Croci; E Calappi; M Cerisara; D Mulazzi; P Vicardi; L Gattinoni
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Technique and complications of percutaneous nephroscopy: experience with 557 patients in the supine position.

Authors:  J G Valdivia Uría; J Valle Gerhold; J A López López; S Villarroya Rodriguez; C Ambroj Navarro; M Ramirez Fabián; J M Rodriguez Bazalo; M A Sánchez Elipe
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with previous open stone surgery.

Authors:  Volkan Tugcu; Fuat Ernis Su; Nadir Kalfazade; Selcuk Sahin; Bedi Ozbay; Ali Ihsan Tasci
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Modified supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones treatable with a single percutaneous access: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Marco De Sio; Riccardo Autorino; Giuseppe Quarto; Francesco Calabrò; Rocco Damiano; Francesco Giugliano; Salvatore Mordente; Massimo D'Armiento
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position: a neglected approach?

Authors:  Denby Steele; Villis Marshall
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  ECIRS (Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery) in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new life for percutaneous surgery?

Authors:  Cecilia Maria Cracco; Cesare Marco Scoffone
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: position, position, position!

Authors:  Zhijian Zhao; Junhong Fan; Yang Liu; Jean de la Rosette; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Middle calyx access is better for single renal pelvic stone in ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Yan Song; Wei Jin; Shengyu Hua; Xiang Fei
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  Recent advancement or less invasive treatment of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Bum Soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-09-07

5.  Feasibility and efficacy of intermediate-supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: initial experience.

Authors:  Doo Yong Chung; Joo Yong Lee; Kyu Hyun Kim; Jae Hyeok Choi; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  Chonnam Med J       Date:  2014-08-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.