Literature DB >> 21335925

Thoracic spine extension mobility in young adults: influence of subject position and spinal curvature.

Stephen J Edmondston1, Robert Waller, Peter Vallin, Andreas Holthe, Andrea Noebauer, Enda King.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
OBJECTIVES: To examine extension mobility of the thoracic spine in young, asymptomatic adults, with particular reference to the influence of subject position and magnitude of the thoracic kyphosis.
BACKGROUND: Impairment of thoracic extension motion is commonly associated with mechanical pain disorders in this region of the spine. Knowledge of normal thoracic mobility and the factors that may influence this motion is important in the evaluation and management of thoracic pain disorders.
METHODS: In 40 asymptomatic adults, the total and regional thoracic extension range of motion was measured using 2-dimensional photographic image analysis. Extension mobility was measured in standing, sitting, prone, and 4-point kneeling. The association between the magnitude of the habitual thoracic kyphosis and extension mobility was also examined.
RESULTS: When measured from the habitual standing position, the mean range of flexion was 11.5° (3.7°) and mean extension range was 8.7° (3.7°). Thoracic extension was significantly greater in unloaded positions compared to loaded positions (P<.001). The standing thoracic kyphosis angle was significantly correlated with the end range thoracic extension angle in all positions (r = 0.63-0.79, P<.001). There was a poor correlation between the thoracic kyphosis angle and thoracic extension range of motion in all positions (r = 0.11-0.34, P>.06).
CONCLUSION: When measured from the habitual standing position, thoracic extension range of motion in young individuals is small and poorly correlated with the magnitude of the standing thoracic kyphosis. Unloaded positions (4-point kneeling and prone), compared to positions that load the spine (standing and sitting), appear to promote a greater range of thoracic extension motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21335925     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  7 in total

1.  Photogrammetry as a tool for the postural evaluation of the spine: A systematic review.

Authors:  Tássia Silveira Furlanetto; Juliana Adami Sedrez; Cláudia Tarragô Candotti; Jefferson Fagundes Loss
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-02-18

2.  Effects of Manual Therapy and Mechanical Massage on Spinal Alignment, Extension Range of Motion, Back Extensor Electromyographic Activity, and Thoracic Extension Strength in Individuals with Thoracic Hyperkyphosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sung-Hoon Jung; Ui-Jae Hwang; Sun-Hee Ahn; Jun-Hee Kim; Oh-Yun Kwon
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Lower spinal postural variability during laptop-work in subjects with cervicogenic headache compared to healthy controls.

Authors:  Sarah Mingels; Wim Dankaerts; Ludo van Etten; Liesbeth Bruckers; Marita Granitzer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Influence of thoracic flexion syndrome on proprioception in the thoracic spine.

Authors:  Kyue-Nam Park; Jae-Seop Oh
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-10-28

5.  Posture and mobility of the upper body quadrant and pulmonary function in COPD: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Nuno Morais; Joana Cruz; Alda Marques
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Clinical reasoning framework for thoracic spine exercise prescription in sport: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Nicola R Heneghan; Svein M Lokhaug; Isaak Tyros; Sigurd Longvastøl; Alison Rushton
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2020-03-29

Review 7.  Analysis of the Active Measurement Systems of the Thoracic Range of Movements of the Spine: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pablo Esteban-González; Eleuterio A Sánchez-Romero; Jorge Hugo Villafañe
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.847

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.