Literature DB >> 21335682

Automation bias - a hidden issue for clinical decision support system use.

Kate Goddard1, Abdul Roudsari, Jeremy C Wyatt.   

Abstract

Automation bias - the tendency to over-rely on automation - has been studied in a variety of academic fields. Clinical Decision Support Systems aim to benefit the clinical decision making process. Although most research shows overall improved performance with use, there is often a failure to recognize the new errors that CDSS can introduce, and the healthcare field has a gap in this research. This paper outlines some of the most compelling theoretical factors in the literature involved in automation bias, and builds a simple model to be tested empirically. Ultimately, this will uncover the mechanisms by which this bias operates and help CDSS producers and healthcare practitioners optimize the medical decision making process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21335682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  5 in total

Review 1.  An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success.

Authors:  Reed T Sutton; David Pincock; Daniel C Baumgart; Daniel C Sadowski; Richard N Fedorak; Karen I Kroeker
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-02-06

2.  A clinical decision support tool for improving adherence to guidelines on anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke: A cluster-randomized trial in a Swedish primary care setting (the CDS-AF study).

Authors:  Lars O Karlsson; Staffan Nilsson; Magnus Bång; Lennart Nilsson; Emmanouil Charitakis; Magnus Janzon
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 11.069

3.  Three Risks That Caution Against a Premature Implementation of Artificial Moral Agents for Practical and Economical Use.

Authors:  Christian Herzog
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Tailoring implementation strategies for evidence-based recommendations using computerised clinical decision support systems: protocol for the development of the GUIDES tools.

Authors:  Stijn Van de Velde; Pavel Roshanov; Tiina Kortteisto; Ilkka Kunnamo; Bert Aertgeerts; Per Olav Vandvik; Signe Flottorp
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 5.  An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success.

Authors:  Reed T Sutton; David Pincock; Daniel C Baumgart; Daniel C Sadowski; Richard N Fedorak; Karen I Kroeker
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-02-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.