Literature DB >> 21335432

Proteomics: a reality-check for putative stem cells.

Marianna Prokopi1, Manuel Mayr.   

Abstract

The concept of using stem cells for cardiovascular repair holds great potential, but uncertainties in preclinical experiments must be addressed before their therapeutic application. Contemporary proteomic techniques can help to characterize cell preparations more thoroughly and identify some of the potential causes that may lead to a high failure rate in clinical trials. The first part of this review discusses the broader application of proteomics to stem cell research by providing an overview of the main proteomic technologies and how they might help the translation of stem cell therapy. The second part focuses on the controversy about endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and raises cautionary flags for marker assignment and assessment of cell purity. A proteomics-led approach in early outgrowth EPCs has already raised the awareness that markers used to define their endothelial potential may arise from an uptake of platelet proteins. A platelet microparticle-related transfer of endothelial characteristics to mononuclear cells can result in a misinterpretation of the assay. The necessity to perform counterstaining for platelet markers in this setting is not fully appreciated. Similarly, the presence of platelets and platelet microparticles is not taken into consideration when functional improvements are directly attributed to EPCs, whereas saline solutions or plain medium serve as controls. Thus, proteomics shed new light on the caveats of a common stem cell assay in cardiovascular research, which might explain some of the inconsistencies in the field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21335432     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.226902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Res        ISSN: 0009-7330            Impact factor:   17.367


  7 in total

Review 1.  Phenotyping patient-derived cells for translational studies in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Stanley Y Shaw; Ari D Brettman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Age-related changes in rat myocardium involve altered capacities of glycosaminoglycans to potentiate growth factor functions and heparan sulfate-altered sulfation.

Authors:  Minh Bao Huynh; Christophe Morin; Gilles Carpentier; Stephanie Garcia-Filipe; Sofia Talhas-Perret; Véronique Barbier-Chassefière; Toin H van Kuppevelt; Isabelle Martelly; Patricia Albanese; Dulce Papy-Garcia
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Bone marrow-derived cells do not engraft into skeletal muscle microvasculature but promote angiogenesis after acute injury.

Authors:  Nicholas Ieronimakis; Aislinn Hays; Morayma Reyes
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  A systematic approach to the establishment and characterization of endothelial progenitor cells for gene therapy.

Authors:  Natalie Jayne Werling; Robin Thorpe; Yuan Zhao
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther Methods       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.396

Review 5.  Endothelial progenitor cells: a new player in lupus?

Authors:  Sahena Haque; M Yvonne Alexander; Ian N Bruce
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 5.156

6.  CD34+ VEGFR-3+ progenitor cells have a potential to differentiate towards lymphatic endothelial cells.

Authors:  Yu-zhen Tan; Hai-jie Wang; Mei-hua Zhang; Zhe Quan; Ting Li; Qi-zhi He
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.310

Review 7.  Proteomics: from single molecules to biological pathways.

Authors:  Sarah R Langley; Joseph Dwyer; Ignat Drozdov; Xiaoke Yin; Manuel Mayr
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 10.787

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.