Literature DB >> 21335333

Patient doses from screen-film and full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening programme.

I H R Hauge1, K Pedersen, A Sanderud, S Hofvind, H M Olerud.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare mean glandular dose (MGD) in all full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and screen film mammography (SFM) systems used in a national mammography screening program. MGD from 31 screening units (7 FFDM and 24 SFM), based on an average of 50 women at each screening unit, representing 12 X-ray models (6 FFDM and 6 SFM) from five different manufacturers were calculated. The MGD was significantly lower for FFDM compared with SFM (craniocaudal): 1.19 versus 1.27 mGy, respectively, mediolateral oblique: 1.33 versus 1.45 mGy, respectively), but not all of the FFDM units provided lower doses than the SFM units. Comparing FFDMs, the photon counting scanning-slit technology provides significantly lower MGDs than direct and indirect conversion digital technology. The choice of target/filter combination influences the MGD, and has to be optimised with regard to breast thickness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21335333     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncq598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  5 in total

1.  Mammographic performance in a population-based screening program: before, during, and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Solveig Hofvind; Per Skaane; Joann G Elmore; Sofie Sebuødegård; Solveig Roth Hoff; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  T M Svahn; N Houssami; I Sechopoulos; S Mattsson
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 4.380

3.  Pain-preventing strategies in mammography: an observational study of simultaneously recorded pain and breast mechanics throughout the entire breast compression cycle.

Authors:  Jerry E de Groot; Mireille J M Broeders; Cornelis A Grimbergen; Gerard J den Heeten
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 4.  Update on new technologies in digital mammography.

Authors:  Stephanie K Patterson; Marilyn A Roubidoux
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-08-14

5.  Breast Cancer Induced by X-Ray Mammography Screening? A Review Based on Recent Understanding of Low-Dose Radiobiology.

Authors:  Ernest K J Pauwels; Nicolas Foray; Michel H Bourguignon
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 1.927

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.