Literature DB >> 21334928

Preferences of patients, their family caregivers and vascular surgeons in the choice of abdominal aortic aneurysms treatment options: the PREFER study.

G Faggioli1, L Scalone, L G Mantovani, F Borghetti, A Stella.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Factors influencing the choice between endovascular (endovascular aneurysm repair, EVAR) and open repair (OPEN) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are of increasing interest. We quantified their importance among the different subjects involved in the treatment.
METHODS: Pre- and postoperative patients (pts), their relatives and vascular surgeons completed questionnaires evaluating six treatment characteristics: anaesthesia; recovery time to basic everyday activities; risk of re-intervention at 5 years (RR); complexity of follow-up; risk of major complications; and additional cost of intervention (AC). Through a discrete choice experiment, hypothetical scenarios of treatment were obtained and the relative importance (RI) of each characteristic was determined through a conditional logistic regression model.
RESULTS: A total of 160 pts, 102 relatives and 30 surgeons from nine centres completed the questionnaires. Major complications and re-intervention risk were the most important characteristics (RI = 56.0% and 27.2%, respectively) for all the respondent categories. Pts and their relatives considered very important also a possible out-of-pocket AC. Recovery time and type of anaesthesia were among the least important characteristics, including hospital additional cost for surgeons. The different categories of respondents showed different opinions towards different treatment characteristics depending also on possible previous treatment.
CONCLUSION: Preferences for AAA treatment characteristics differ between groups of involved subjects. Understanding individuals' preferences could help in optimising treatment benefits.
Copyright © 2011 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21334928     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.12.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  10 in total

Review 1.  A descriptive review on methods to prioritize outcomes in a health care context.

Authors:  Inger M Janssen; Ansgar Gerhardus; Milly A Schröer-Günther; Fülöp Scheibler
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mark Harrison; Dan Rigby; Caroline Vass; Terry Flynn; Jordan Louviere; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael D Clark; Domino Determann; Stavros Petrou; Domenico Moro; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS Score.

Authors:  Fábio Hüsemann Menezes; Bárbara Ferrarezi; Moisés Amâncio de Souza; Susyanne Lavor Cosme; Giovani José Dal Poggetto Molinari
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-02

5.  What are the decision-making preferences of patients in vascular surgery? A mixed-methods study.

Authors:  T B Katrien Santema; E Anniek Stoffer; Marleen Kunneman; Mark J W Koelemay; Dirk T Ubbink
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  A clinical and ethical review on late results and benefits after EVAR.

Authors:  Carlo Setacci; Pasqualino Sirignano; Vittorio Fineschi; Paola Frati; Giovanna Ricci; Francesco Speziale
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2017-02-20

7.  Patients', physicians', nurses', and pharmacists' preferences on the characteristics of biologic agents used in the treatment of rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Luciana Scalone; Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini; Luigi Sinigaglia; Carlomaurizio Montecucco; Roberto Giacomelli; Giovanni Lapadula; Ignazio Olivieri; Angela Maria Giardino; Paolo Angelo Cortesi; Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani; Monica Mecchia
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Factors and Situations Affecting the Value of Patient Preference Studies: Semi-Structured Interviews in Europe and the US.

Authors:  Chiara Whichello; Eline van Overbeeke; Rosanne Janssens; Karin Schölin Bywall; Selena Russo; Jorien Veldwijk; Irina Cleemput; Juhaeri Juhaeri; Bennett Levitan; Jürgen Kübler; Meredith Smith; Richard Hermann; Matthias Englbrecht; Axel J Hueber; Alina Comanescu; Sarah Harding; Steven Simoens; Isabelle Huys; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 9.  Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.

Authors:  Mark Harrison; Katherine Milbers; Marie Hudson; Nick Bansback
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Incidence and Fate of Refractory Type II Endoleak after EVAR: A Retrospective Experience of Two High-Volume Italian Centers.

Authors:  Pasqualino Sirignano; Nicola Mangialardi; Martina Nespola; Francesco Aloisi; Matteo Orrico; Sonia Ronchey; Flavia Del Porto; Maurizio Taurino
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.