Literature DB >> 21334761

Hospital determinants of emergency department left without being seen rates.

Renee Y Hsia1, Steven M Asch, Robert E Weiss, David Zingmond, Li-Jung Liang, Weijuan Han, Heather McCreath, Benjamin C Sun.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The proportion of patients who leave without being seen in the emergency department (ED) is an outcome-oriented measure of impaired access to emergency care and represents the failure of an emergency care delivery system to meet its goals of providing care to those most in need. Little is known about variation in the amount of left without being seen or about hospital-level determinants. Such knowledge is necessary to target hospital-level interventions to improve access to emergency care. We seek to determine whether hospital-level socioeconomic status case mix or hospital structural characteristics are predictive of ED left without being seen rates.
METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of all acute-care, nonfederal hospitals in California that operated an ED in 2007, using data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database and the US census. Our outcome of interest was whether a visit to a given hospital ED resulted in left without being seen. The proportion of left without being seen was measured by the number of left without being seen cases out of the total number of visits.
RESULTS: We studied 9.2 million ED visits to 262 hospitals in California. The percentage of left without being seen varied greatly over hospitals, ranging from 0% to 20.3%, with a median percentage of 2.6%. In multivariable analyses adjusting for hospital-level socioeconomic status case mix, visitors to EDs with a higher proportion of low-income and poorly insured patients experienced a higher risk of left without being seen. We found that the odds of an ED visit resulting in left without being seen increased by a factor of 1.15 for each 10-percentage-point increase in poorly insured patients, and odds of left without being seen decreased by a factor of 0.86 for each $10,000 increase in household income. When hospital structural characteristics were added to the model, county ownership, trauma center designation, and teaching program affiliation were positively associated with increased probability of left without being seen (odds ratio 2.09; 1.62, and 2.14, respectively), and these factors attenuated the association with insurance status.
CONCLUSION: Visitors to different EDs experience a large variation in their probability of left without being seen, and visitors to hospitals serving a high proportion of low-income and poorly insured patients are at disproportionately higher risk of leaving without being seen. Our findings suggest that there is room for substantial improvement in this outcome, and regional interventions can be targeted toward certain at-risk hospitals to improve access to emergency care.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21334761      PMCID: PMC3126631          DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  45 in total

1.  Hospital factors associated with emergency center patients leaving without being seen.

Authors:  D Hobbs; S C Kunzman; D Tandberg; D Sklar
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.469

2.  Are clinician-investigators Bayesian?

Authors:  R J Lewis
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Emergency department overcrowding following systematic hospital restructuring: trends at twenty hospitals over ten years.

Authors:  M J Schull; J P Szalai; B Schwartz; D A Redelmeier
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Emergency department capacity and access in California, 1990-2001: an economic analysis.

Authors:  Glenn A Melnick; Amar C Nawathe; Anil Bamezai; Lois Green
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Jan-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Staffing, capacity, and ambulance diversion in emergency departments: United States, 2003-04.

Authors:  Catharine W Burt; Linda F McCaig
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  2006-09-27

6.  Bayesian methods for data analysis.

Authors:  Robert E Weiss
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Access to specialty care and medical services in community health centers.

Authors:  Nakela L Cook; LeRoi S Hicks; A James O'Malley; Thomas Keegan; Edward Guadagnoli; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  A framework for the study of access to medical care.

Authors:  L A Aday; R Andersen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  The national profile of access to medical care: where do we stand?

Authors:  L A Aday; R M Andersen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  The effect of crowding on access and quality in an academic ED.

Authors:  Teri L Vieth; Karin V Rhodes
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.469

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  A research agenda to assure equity during periods of emergency department crowding.

Authors:  Ula Hwang; Ellen J Weber; Lynne D Richardson; Vicki Sweet; Knox Todd; Gallane Abraham; Felix Ankel
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  California hospitals serving large minority populations were more likely than others to employ ambulance diversion.

Authors:  Renee Yuen-Jan Hsia; Steven M Asch; Robert E Weiss; David Zingmond; Li-Jung Liang; Weijuan Han; Heather McCreath; Benjamin C Sun
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Is emergency department crowding associated with increased "bounceback" admissions?

Authors:  Renee Y Hsia; Steven M Asch; Robert E Weiss; David Zingmond; Gelareh Gabayan; Li-Jung Liang; Weijuan Han; Heather McCreath; Benjamin C Sun
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Emergency room crowding: a marker of hospital health.

Authors:  Robert A Barish; Patrick L McGauly; Thomas C Arnold
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2012

Review 5.  Census-based socioeconomic indicators for monitoring injury causes in the USA: a review.

Authors:  Nathaniel Bell; Amanda Arrington; Swann Arp Adams
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.399

6.  Paediatric emergency department overcrowding and adverse patient outcomes.

Authors:  Melissa Chan; Garth Meckler; Quynh Doan
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.253

7.  Characteristics and retention of emergency department patients who left without being seen (LWBS).

Authors:  Nathan Roby; Hayden Smith; Jonathan Hurdelbrink; Steven Craig; Clint Hawthorne; Samuel DuMontier; Nicholas Kluesner
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-06-13       Impact factor: 5.472

8.  Missing the boat: odds for the patients who leave ED without being seen.

Authors:  Jabeen Fayyaz; Munawar Khursheed; Mohammed Umer Mir; Amber Mehmood
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2013-01-16

9.  The Long-Term Effect of an Independent Capacity Protocol on Emergency Department Length of Stay: A before and after Study.

Authors:  Won Chul Cha; Kyoung Jun Song; Jin Sung Cho; Adam J Singer; Sang Do Shin
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Improving Emergency Department Door to Doctor Time and Process Reliability: A Successful Implementation of Lean Methodology.

Authors:  Mazen J El Sayed; Ghada R El-Eid; Miriam Saliba; Rima Jabbour; Eveline A Hitti
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.