Literature DB >> 21334681

Duration of microdissection testicular sperm extraction procedures: relationship to sperm retrieval success.

Ranjith Ramasamy1, Erik S Fisher, Joseph A Ricci, Robert A Leung, Peter N Schlegel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the operative time of microdissection testicular sperm extraction in successful and failed procedures to identify the chance of sperm retrieval during longer microsurgical procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 793 men with nonobstructive azoospermia underwent a first attempt at microdissection testicular sperm extraction from January 2000 to September 2009. Clinical factors were analyzed, including age, testicular volume, endocrinological data and histology. Operative time was calculated from incision until the procedure was terminated.
RESULTS: Testicular sperm were successfully retrieved in 57% of the men. Sperm were found within 2, 2 to 4 and 4 to 7 hours in 89%, 30% and 37% of the men, respectively. There were no differences in preoperative clinical characteristics, age, follicle-stimulating hormone, testicular volume, incidence of a Klinefelter's syndrome diagnosis and distribution of most advanced histopathology in patients in the 3 operative time groups. In men in whom sperm were retrieved the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were 48%, 45% and 29%, and 37%, 30% and 29% for operative times up to 2, 2 to 4 and 4 to 7 hours, respectively (p >0.05). ROC curve analysis of the different operative times for detecting sperm showed that 125 minutes was the most accurate time (AUC 0.81) with 84% sensitivity and 95% specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: The chance of sperm retrieval during microdissection testicular sperm extraction was best during the first 2 hours of the operation. However, sperm were still found in up to 37% of men who required greater than 4 hours of microdissection. Retrospective analysis of our data indicated no cutoff point after which sperm retrieval was uniformly unsuccessful.
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21334681     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

Review 1.  Surgical recovery of sperm in non-obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Tomomoto Ishikawa
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 2.  Surgical techniques for the management of male infertility.

Authors:  Natalya A Lopushnyan; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Optimization of a microfluidic spiral channel used to separate sperm from blood cells.

Authors:  Sabin Nepal; Haidong Feng; Bruce K Gale
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  Ploidy of spermatogenic cells of men with non-mosaic Klinefelter's syndrome as measured by a computerized cell scanning system.

Authors:  Alisa Komsky-Elbaz; Arieh Raziel; Ido Ben-Ami; Orna Bern; Billa Maslansky; Yariv S Gidoni; Raphael Ron-El; Deborah Strassburger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: an update.

Authors:  Ali A Dabaja; Peter N Schlegel
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 6.  Progressing management of non-obstructive azoospermia in the era of microdissection testicular sperm extraction.

Authors:  Satoru Kanto; Kazumitsu Yamasaki; Teruaki Iwamoto
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2014-03-08

7.  A novel stepwise micro-TESE approach in non obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Giorgio Franco; Filomena Scarselli; Valentina Casciani; Cosimo De Nunzio; Donato Dente; Costantino Leonardo; Pier Francesco Greco; Alessia Greco; Maria Giulia Minasi; Ermanno Greco
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 8.  An update on sperm retrieval techniques for azoospermic males.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Ricardo Miyaoka; José Eduardo Orosz; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction as an alternative for sperm acquisition in the most difficult cases of Azoospermia: Technique and preliminary results in India.

Authors:  Mohamed C Ashraf; Sankalp Singh; Dharma Raj; Sujatha Ramakrishnan; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2013-04

Review 10.  Updates on sperm retrieval techniques.

Authors:  Andrew Leung; Jose Mira; Wayland Hsiao
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2014-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.