Literature DB >> 21334628

The SCoRE residual: a quality index to assess the accuracy of joint estimations.

Rainald M Ehrig1, Markus O Heller, Stefan Kratzenstein, Georg N Duda, Adam Trepczynski, William R Taylor.   

Abstract

The determination of an accurate centre of rotation (CoR) from skin markers is essential for the assessment of abnormal gait patterns in clinical gait analysis. Despite the many functional approaches to estimate CoRs, no non-invasive analytical determination of the error in the reconstructed joint location is currently available. The purpose of this study was therefore to verify the residual of the symmetrical centre of rotation estimation (SCoRE) as a reliable indirect measure of the error of the computed joint centre. To evaluate the SCoRE residual, numerical simulations were performed to evaluate CoR estimations at different ranges of joint motion. A statistical model was developed and used to determine the theoretical relationships among the SCoRE residual, the magnitude of the skin marker artefact, the corrections to the marker positions, and the error of the CoR estimations to the known centre of rotation. We found that the equation err=0.5r(s) provides a reliable relationship among the CoR error, err, and the scaled SCoRE residual, r(s), providing that any skin marker artefact is first minimised using the optimal common shape technique (OCST). Measurements on six healthy volunteers showed a reduction of SCoRE residual from 11 to below 6mm and therefore demonstrated consistency of the theoretical considerations and numerical simulations with the in vivo data. This study also demonstrates the significant benefit of the OCST for reducing skin marker artefact and thus for predicting the accuracy of determining joint centre positions in functional gait analysis. For the first time, this understanding of the SCoRE residual allows a measure of error in the non-invasive assessment of joint centres. This measure now enables a rapid assessment of the accuracy of the CoR as well as an estimation of the reproducibility and repeatability of skeletal motion patterns.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21334628     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  11 in total

Review 1.  The helical axis of anatomical joints: calculation methods, literature review, and software implementation.

Authors:  Andrea Ancillao
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  In-vivo quantification of dynamic hip joint center errors and soft tissue artifact.

Authors:  Niccolo M Fiorentino; Penny R Atkins; Michael J Kutschke; K Bo Foreman; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Accuracy of Functional and Predictive Methods to Calculate the Hip Joint Center in Young Non-pathologic Asymptomatic Adults with Dual Fluoroscopy as a Reference Standard.

Authors:  Niccolo M Fiorentino; Michael J Kutschke; Penny R Atkins; K Bo Foreman; Ashley L Kapron; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Estimated forces and moments experienced by osseointegrated endoprostheses for lower extremity amputees.

Authors:  Carolyn E Taylor; Yue Zhang; Yuqing Qiu; Heath B Henninger; K Bo Foreman; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  ILIOTIBIAL BAND SYNDROME IN CYCLING: A COMBINED EXPERIMENTAL-SIMULATION APPROACH FOR ASSESSING THE EFFECT OF SADDLE SETBACK.

Authors:  Mathieu Ménard; Patrick Lacouture; Mathieu Domalain
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-12

6.  Towards Subject-Specific Strength Training Design through Predictive Use of Musculoskeletal Models.

Authors:  Michael Plüss; Florian Schellenberg; William R Taylor; Silvio Lorenzetti
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.781

7.  Impact of antagonistic muscle co-contraction on in vivo knee contact forces.

Authors:  Adam Trepczynski; Ines Kutzner; Verena Schwachmeyer; Markus O Heller; Tilman Pfitzner; Georg N Duda
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  The Effect of Ankle Bracing on Kinematics in Simulated Sprain and Drop Landings: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.

Authors:  Alison N Agres; Marios Chrysanthou; Peter C Raffalt
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  PCL insufficient patients with increased translational and rotational passive knee joint laxity have no increased range of anterior-posterior and rotational tibiofemoral motion during level walking.

Authors:  Stephan Oehme; Philippe Moewis; Heide Boeth; Benjamin Bartek; Annika Lippert; Christoph von Tycowicz; Rainald Ehrig; Georg N Duda; Tobias Jung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  Validation of a Novel Device for the Knee Monitoring of Orthopaedic Patients.

Authors:  Mahmut Enes Kayaalp; Alison N Agres; Jan Reichmann; Maxim Bashkuev; Georg N Duda; Roland Becker
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.