OBJECTIVE: To report our experience of radical abdominal trachelectomy for patients with cervical malignancies. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing fertility-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy for cervical malignancies at our institution from 04/2004 to 09/2010. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients with cervical malignancies underwent laparotomy for planned radical abdominal trachelectomy. Two patients needed immediate completion of radical hysterectomy due to unfavorable intraoperative findings. Median age was 29.5 years (range, 11-41). Histology included 8 (12.9%) with adenocarcinoma, 50 (80.65%) with squamous carcinoma, 1 (1.61%) with adenosquamous carcinoma and 3 (4.84%) with botryoid sarcoma. Median number of nodes evaluated was 25 (range, 12-53); Ten (16.13%) patients with pathologic risk factors received adjuvant therapy. Fourteen of 36 IB1 cases had tumor size >2cm. No recurrences were observed at a median follow-up of 22.8 months. Five (8.06%) patients developed postoperative cervical stenosis--all occurred before we started to routinely install T-IUDs during the procedure. Thirty-eight patients completed the survey which aimed to understand what factors influenced these patients' reproductive outcomes. For various reasons, only 10 patients attempted to conceive and 2 of them succeeded. One of them delivered by cesarean section after 39 weeks and the other is currently pregnant. CONCLUSIONS: Radical abdominal trachelectomy seems to be a reasonable option for selected patients whose tumors are no larger than 4cm when conducted by experienced gynecologic oncologists. The main perioperative complication is postoperative cervical stenosis, which could be effectively prevented by installation of a tailed T-IUD during the surgery. Social, familial and physical factors can largely influence the patients' reproductive outcomes. The issues of reproductive concerns and quality of life require further investigation.
OBJECTIVE: To report our experience of radical abdominal trachelectomy for patients with cervical malignancies. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing fertility-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy for cervical malignancies at our institution from 04/2004 to 09/2010. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients with cervical malignancies underwent laparotomy for planned radical abdominal trachelectomy. Two patients needed immediate completion of radical hysterectomy due to unfavorable intraoperative findings. Median age was 29.5 years (range, 11-41). Histology included 8 (12.9%) with adenocarcinoma, 50 (80.65%) with squamous carcinoma, 1 (1.61%) with adenosquamous carcinoma and 3 (4.84%) with botryoid sarcoma. Median number of nodes evaluated was 25 (range, 12-53); Ten (16.13%) patients with pathologic risk factors received adjuvant therapy. Fourteen of 36 IB1 cases had tumor size >2cm. No recurrences were observed at a median follow-up of 22.8 months. Five (8.06%) patients developed postoperative cervical stenosis--all occurred before we started to routinely install T-IUDs during the procedure. Thirty-eight patients completed the survey which aimed to understand what factors influenced these patients' reproductive outcomes. For various reasons, only 10 patients attempted to conceive and 2 of them succeeded. One of them delivered by cesarean section after 39 weeks and the other is currently pregnant. CONCLUSIONS: Radical abdominal trachelectomy seems to be a reasonable option for selected patients whose tumors are no larger than 4cm when conducted by experienced gynecologic oncologists. The main perioperative complication is postoperative cervical stenosis, which could be effectively prevented by installation of a tailed T-IUD during the surgery. Social, familial and physical factors can largely influence the patients' reproductive outcomes. The issues of reproductive concerns and quality of life require further investigation.
Authors: Carlo Ronsini; Maria Cristina Solazzo; Nicolò Bizzarri; Domenico Ambrosio; Marco La Verde; Marco Torella; Raffaela Maria Carotenuto; Luigi Cobellis; Nicola Colacurci; Pasquale De Franciscis Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-09-05 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Stephanie L Wethington; Yukio Sonoda; Kay J Park; Kaled M Alektiar; William P Tew; Dennis S Chi; Mario M Leitao; Elizabeth L Jewell; Richard R Barakat; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Pedro F Escobar; Pedro T Ramirez; Rafael E Garcia Ocasio; Rene Pareja; Steve Zimberg; Michael Sprague; Michael Frumovitz Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 5.482