Literature DB >> 21334050

Quality of life among men with prostate cancer in rural Georgia.

K Steenland1, M Goodman, J Liff, C Diiorio, S Butler, P Roberts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To perform a population-based study on the quality of life (QOL) after prostate cancer treatment in a rural and disadvantaged population, because these have been sparse.
METHODS: We conducted a follow-up study of 260 men with incident prostate cancer in a largely rural area of Southwest Georgia. The subjects underwent interviews at baseline and 6 and 12 months after the diagnosis. The analyses compared the 6- and 12-month QOL to that at baseline using linear and Poisson regression analyses for longitudinal data.
RESULTS: Across all treatment groups, the self-reported physical and emotional QOL declined significantly after treatment, with little difference between that at 6 and that at 12 months. The decline in physical/emotional QOL did not differ by age, race, education, or Gleason score but was more pronounced among those with no comorbidities. Patients treated with hormones showed the worst deterioration in physical and emotional QOL, with the watchful waiting and external beam radiotherapy groups were the least affected. After 12 months, the percentage of men reporting that sexual, urinary, and bowel function was a large or very large problem was 53%, 22%, and 9% compared with 27%, 25%, and 4% at baseline, respectively. Worse bowel and urinary function played a stronger role than sexual function in predicting the overall physical and emotional QOL. Urinary obstruction improved but incontinence worsened. The doctors' and patients' assessment of the QOL showed only a low correlation, with patients reporting worse post-treatment QOL than the doctors.
CONCLUSIONS: The general and most prostate-specific QOL measures (except for urinary function) in this previously understudied population declined after 6 months and remained about the same at 12 months after treatment of prostate cancer.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21334050     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

1.  Evidence-based guideline recommendations on low-dose rate brachytherapy in patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  George Rodrigues; Xiaomei Yao; D Andrew Loblaw; Michael Brundage; Joseph L Chin
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Low-dose rate brachytherapy for patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  George Rodrigues; Xiaomei Yao; D Andrew Loblaw; Michael Brundage; Joseph L Chin
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Patient perspective on watchful waiting/active surveillance for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jinping Xu; Anne Victoria Neale; Rhonda K Dailey; Susan Eggly; Kendra L Schwartz
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

Review 4.  Psychosocial well-being and supportive care needs of cancer patients and survivors living in rural or regional areas: a systematic review from 2010 to 2021.

Authors:  Shannen R van der Kruk; Phyllis Butow; Ilse Mesters; Terry Boyle; Ian Olver; Kate White; Sabe Sabesan; Rob Zielinski; Bryan A Chan; Kristiaan Spronk; Peter Grimison; Craig Underhill; Laura Kirsten; Kate M Gunn
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Five-year follow-up study of a population-based prospective cohort of men with low-risk prostate cancer: the treatment options in prostate cancer study (TOPCS): study protocol.

Authors:  Jinping Xu; Michael Goodman; James Janisse; Michael L Cher; Cathryn Hufford Bock
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Evolution of a CDC Public Health Research Agenda for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ingrid J Hall; Judith Lee Smith
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.043

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.