Literature DB >> 21334030

Best practices for robotic surgery training and credentialing.

Jason Y Lee1, Phillip Mucksavage, Chandru P Sundaram, Elspeth M McDougall.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: With the rapid and widespread adoption of robotics in surgery, the minimally invasive surgical landscape has changed markedly within the last half decade. This change has had a significant impact on patients, surgeons and surgical trainees. This is no more apparent than in the field of urology. As with the advent of any new surgical technology, it is imperative that we develop comprehensive and responsible training and credentialing initiatives to ensure surgical outcomes and patient safety are not compromised during the learning process.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted on surgical training curricula as well as robotic surgery training and credentialing to provide best practice recommendations for the development of a robotic surgery training curriculum and credentialing process.
RESULTS: For trainees to attain the requisite knowledge and skills to provide safe and effective patient care, surgical training in robotics should involve a structured, competency based curriculum that allows the trainee to progress in a graduated fashion. This structured curriculum should involve preclinical and clinical components to facilitate the proper adoption and application of this new technology. Robotic surgery credentialing should involve an expert determined, standardized educational process, including a minimum criterion of proficiency.
CONCLUSIONS: Rather than being based on a set number of completed cases, robotic surgery credentialing should involve the demonstration of proficiency and safety in executing basic robotic skills and procedural tasks. In addition, the accreditation process should be iterative to ensure accountability to the patient.
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21334030     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  41 in total

1.  Comprehensive proficiency-based inanimate training for robotic surgery: reliability, feasibility, and educational benefit.

Authors:  Nabeel A Arain; Genevieve Dulan; Deborah C Hogg; Robert V Rege; Cathryn E Powers; Seifu T Tesfay; Linda S Hynan; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Survey of robotic surgery credentialing requirements for physicians completing OB/GYN residency.

Authors:  Britt K Erickson; Jonathan L Gleason; Warner K Huh; Holly E Richter
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.137

3.  Education and training in pediatric robotic surgery: lessons learned from an inaugural multinational workshop.

Authors:  Thomas P Cundy; Erik K Mayer; Juan I Camps; Lars H Olsen; Gloria Pelizzo; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi; Azad S Najmaldin
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-10-17

4.  Comment on "education and training in pediatric robotic surgery: lessons learned from an inaugural multinational workshop".

Authors:  Mohan S Gundeti
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-02-14

5.  Development and testing of a robotic surgical training curriculum for novice surgeons.

Authors:  Sondra Summers; Jennifer Anderson; Amy Petzel; Megan Tarr; Kimberly Kenton
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-09-16

Review 6.  Training and outcome monitoring in robotic urologic surgery.

Authors:  Daniel Liberman; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Claudio Jeldres; Luc Valiquette; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Simulation in surgical education.

Authors:  Sandra L de Montbrun; Helen Macrae
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-09

8.  Construct validity of nine new inanimate exercises for robotic surgeon training using a standardized setup.

Authors:  Anthony M Jarc; Myriam Curet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Content and face validation of a curriculum for ultrasonic propulsion of calculi in a human renal model.

Authors:  Ryan S Hsi; Barbrina Dunmire; Bryan W Cunitz; Xuemei He; Mathew D Sorensen; Jonathan D Harper; Michael R Bailey; Thomas S Lendvay
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Robotics in otolaryngology and head and neck surgery: Recommendations for training and credentialing: A report of the 2015 AHNS education committee, AAO-HNS robotic task force and AAO-HNS sleep disorders committee.

Authors:  Neil D Gross; F Christopher Holsinger; J Scott Magnuson; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Eric M Genden; Tamer Ah Ghanem; Kathleen L Yaremchuk; David Goldenberg; Matthew C Miller; Eric J Moore; Luc Gt Morris; James Netterville; Gregory S Weinstein; Jeremy Richmon
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.