Literature DB >> 21333772

Carbohydrate modified ultrafine ceramic nanoparticles for allergen immunotherapy.

Ravi Shankar Pandey1, Satish Sahu, M S Sudheesh, Jitender Madan, Manoj Kumar, Vinod Kumar Dixit.   

Abstract

The uses of drug-delivery systems in allergen specific immunotherapy appear to be a promising approach due to their ability to act as adjuvants, transport the allergens to immune-competent cells and tissues and reduce the number of administrations. The aim of this work was to evaluate the carbohydrate modified ultrafine ceramic core based nanoparticles (aquasomes) as adjuvant/delivery vehicle in specific immunotherapy using ovalbumin (OVA) as an allergen model. Prepared nanoparticles were characterized for size, shape, zeta potential, antigen integrity, surface adsorption efficiency and in vitro release. The humoral and cellular-induced immune responses generated by OVA adsorbed aquasomes were studied by two intradermal immunizations in BALB/c mice. OVA sensitized mice were treated with OVA adsorbed aquasomes and OVA adsorbed aluminum hydroxide following established protocol. Fifteen days after therapy, animals were challenged with OVA and different signs of anaphylactic shock were evaluated. Developed aquasomes possessed a negative zeta potential (-11.3 mV) and an average size of 47 nm with OVA adsorption efficiency of ~60.2 μg mg(-1) of hydroxyapatite core. In vivo immune response after two intradermal injections with OVA adsorbed aquasomes resulted in a mixed Th1/Th2-type immune response. OVA-sensitized mice model, treatment with OVA adsorbed aquasomes elicited lower levels of IgE (p<0.05), serum histamine and higher survival rate in comparison with alum adsorbed OVA. Symptoms of anaphylactic shock in OVA aquasome-treated mice were weaker than the one induced in the alum adsorbed OVA group. Results from this study demonstrate the valuable use of aquasomes in allergen immunotherapy.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21333772     DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2011.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol        ISSN: 1567-5769            Impact factor:   4.932


  7 in total

Review 1.  Nanocarrier fabrication and macromolecule drug delivery: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Vibhuti Agrahari; Vivek Agrahari; Ashim K Mitra
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2016

Review 2.  Adjuvants for allergy immunotherapeutics.

Authors:  Carlos Gamazo; Carmen D'Amelio; Gabriel Gastaminza; Marta Ferrer; Juan M Irache
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Lipid nanoparticles as delivery vehicles for the Parietaria judaica major allergen Par j 2.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Bondì; Giovanna Montana; Emanuela Fabiola Craparo; Roberto Di Gesù; Gaetano Giammona; Angela Bonura; Paolo Colombo
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2011-11-21

Review 4.  Nanomaterials in the Context of Type 2 Immune Responses-Fears and Potentials.

Authors:  Martin Himly; Robert Mills-Goodlet; Mark Geppert; Albert Duschl
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte elicited therapeutic vaccine candidate targeting cancer against MAGE-A11 carcinogenic protein.

Authors:  Neeraj Kumar; Damini Sood; Aditya Gupta; Niraj Kumar Jha; Pallavi Jain; Ramesh Chandra
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 6.  Drug Carrier for Photodynamic Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Tilahun Ayane Debele; Sydney Peng; Hsieh-Chih Tsai
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Formulations for Allergen Immunotherapy in Human and Veterinary Patients: New Candidates on the Horizon.

Authors:  Isabella Pali-Schöll; Douglas J DeBoer; Claudia Alessandri; Ahmed Adel Seida; Ralf S Mueller; Erika Jensen-Jarolim
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 7.561

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.