Literature DB >> 21332837

Early decision of gastrostomy tube insertion in children with severe developmental disability: a current dilemma.

C Martínez-Costa1, S Borraz, C Benlloch, A López-Sáiz, V Sanchiz, J Brines.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals advise earlier gastrostomy tube (GT) placement in children with severe developmental disabilities, marked feeding disorders and risk of malnutrition. However, a delay in acceptance of the procedure by parents/guardians is the main issue of concern. The present study aimed to investigate: (i) parental satisfaction with GT feeding and whether parents/carers would have accepted earlier GT placement and (ii) subsequent nutritional outcome.
METHODS: Twenty-six disabled children with GT feeding were recruited. A structured questionnaire by telephone was held to record parental perceptions of GT (mainly satisfaction with the procedure and patient management). A longitudinal study (0-6-12 months) was designed to investigate anthropometric outcome. Nutritional support mode and GT-related complications were also recorded.
RESULTS: Parents/carers showed high satisfaction (91%). Furthermore, 87% recognised that they would have accepted an earlier placement of the GT had they anticipated the outcome. Patient management and family dynamics were acknowledged to have improved considerably. Nutritional assessment demonstrated a positive trend in weight. Height improved significantly 6 months post-implantation (P = 0.045) and body mass index improved after 12 months (P = 0.041). When comparing nutritional outcome between children in whom the GT was placed before 18 months of age and those in whom it was placed later, height was found to improve significantly in the first group (P = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Most parents/carers would have agreed to earlier GT feeding of their children had they acknowledged its benefits. Although nutritional response was positive, it was less so than the parental perception of children's overall improvement. Growth rates were significantly increased when GT was placed early in life.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2011 The British Dietetic Association Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21332837     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01146.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet        ISSN: 0952-3871            Impact factor:   3.089


  6 in total

1.  How can clinical ethics guide the management of comorbidities in the child with Rett syndrome?

Authors:  Jenny Downs; David Forbes; Michael Johnson; Helen Leonard
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 1.954

2.  Epidemiology of gastrostomy insertion for children and adolescents with intellectual disability.

Authors:  Kingsley Wong; Helen Leonard; Glenn Pearson; Emma J Glasson; David Forbes; Madhur Ravikumara; Peter Jacoby; Jenny Bourke; Preeyaporn Srasuebkul; Julian Trollor; Andrew Wilson; Lakshmi Nagarajan; Jenny Downs
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Experience of gastrostomy using a quality care framework: the example of rett syndrome.

Authors:  Jenny Downs; Kingsley Wong; Madhur Ravikumara; Carolyn Ellaway; Elizabeth J Elliott; John Christodoulou; Peter Jacoby; Helen Leonard
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Nutrition of Patients with Severe Neurologic Impairment.

Authors:  Anija Orel; Matjaz Homan; Rok Blagus; Evgen Benedik; Rok Orel; Natasa Fidler Mis
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Timing of gastrostomy insertion in children with a neurodisability: a cross-sectional study of early versus late intervention.

Authors:  Raman Sharma; Andrew N Williams; Win Zaw
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Laparoscopic versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in children: Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nutnicha Suksamanapun; Femke A Mauritz; Josephine Franken; David C van der Zee; Maud Ya van Herwaarden-Lindeboom
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.