Literature DB >> 21332773

Women's preferences for aspects of labor management: results from a discrete choice experiment.

Graham S Scotland1, Paul McNamee, Helen Cheyne, Vanora Hundley, Carol Barnett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The latent phase of labor can vary greatly in duration, and many women are uncertain about when to contact the maternity unit. The aim of this study was to elicit and value women's preferences for some aspects of labor management.
METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 1,251 women who had recently given birth to their first child at one of 14 maternity units in Scotland. Discrete choice questions were used to measure women's preferences for five attributes of care: number of visits (assessments) before admission to the labor ward, time spent on the labor ward before delivery, mobility during labor, pain relief required, and mode of delivery. Responses were analyzed for the sample as a whole and for subgroups defined by recent experiences of labor.
RESULTS: A total of 730 (58.4%) questionnaires were returned and analyzed. Women expressed a preference for fewer visits before admission, shorter times on the labor ward before delivery, mobility during labor, normal vaginal deliveries, and moderate forms of pain relief (Entonox and opiates). Subgroup analysis suggests that women's preferences for pain relief are influenced by their recent labor experience. The elicited preference values provide a means for estimating the tradeoffs women are willing to make between attributes of labor management.
CONCLUSIONS: Women appear to dislike being turned away from the labor ward before admission for delivery. Extra visits before admission only appear to be a price worth paying if they result in reductions in the duration of time spent on the labor ward, reductions in the chance of being immobilized in hospital during labor, or a lower chance of requiring an instrumental or operative delivery.
© 2010, Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation © 2010, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21332773     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00447.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  17 in total

Review 1.  Valuing Meta-Health Effects for Use in Economic Evaluations to Inform Reimbursement Decisions: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Richard De Abreu Lourenco; Marion Haas; Jane Hall; Rosalie Viney
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Mode of delivery preferences in a diverse population of pregnant women.

Authors:  Lynn M Yee; Anjali J Kaimal; Kathryn A Houston; Erica Wu; Mari-Paule Thiet; Sanae Nakagawa; Aaron B Caughey; Atoosa Firouzian; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Healthy birth practice #2: walk, move around, and change positions throughout labor.

Authors:  Michele Ondeck
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2014

4.  Parturients' Stated Preferences for Labor Analgesia: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Semra Ozdemir; Teresa Chen; Chin Wen Tan; Wei Han Melvin Wong; Hon Sen Tan; Eric Andrew Finkelstein; Ban Leong Sng
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 5.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael D Clark; Domino Determann; Stavros Petrou; Domenico Moro; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Trading patients' choice in providers for quality of maternity care? A discrete choice experiment amongst pregnant women.

Authors:  Mattijs S Lambooij; Jorien Veldwijk; Paul F van Gils; Anita W M Suijkerbuijk; Jeroen N Struijs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Ethnic differences in the use of intrapartum epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Alberto Jiménez-Puente; Nicolás Benítez-Parejo; Jorge Del Diego-Salas; Francisco Rivas-Ruiz; Claudio Maañón-Di Leo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Being in a safe and thus secure place, the core of early labour: A secondary analysis in a Swedish context.

Authors:  Ing-Marie Carlsson
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2016-05-10

9.  Women's preferences for inpatient and outpatient priming for labour induction: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Kirsten Howard; Karen Gerard; Pamela Adelson; Robert Bryce; Chris Wilkinson; Deborah Turnbull
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Dutch women in midwife-led care at the onset of labour: which pain relief do they prefer and what do they use?

Authors:  Trudy Klomp; Ank de Jonge; Eileen K Hutton; Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.