Literature DB >> 21332772

Variability in rate of cervical dilation in nulliparous women at term.

Maddalena Incerti1, Anna Locatelli, Alessandro Ghidini, Elena Ciriello, Sara Consonni, John C Pezzullo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical dilatation is commonly documented on a partogram indicating the expected rate of progress of labor. Although deviations from such a line can be used to indicate abnormal progress, what constitutes the "normal" rate of cervical dilation is still largely unknown. The objectives of this study were to assess the variability of the rate of cervical dilation in nulliparous women and to determine whether the rate of labor was independent of dilation on admission.
METHODS: We analyzed a cohort of consecutive nulliparous women with spontaneous labor at term and singleton fetuses in cephalic presentation. Exclusion criteria were gestational age less than 37 weeks, induction of labor, or the presence of a uterine scar. Management of labor was standardized using set protocols of care. Active labor was diagnosed as regular contractions every 10 minutes or less, lasting more than 40 seconds, with cervical effacement more than 80 percent and dilation of 2 cm. Vaginal examinations were performed by a dedicated midwife every 2 hours. Amniotomy was performed for slow progress or arrest of dilation over 2 hours. Oxytocin was administered for arrest of cervical dilation for 2 hours with membranes ruptured. Data pertaining to cases ending in cesarean delivery were included up to the time of cesarean section.
RESULTS: The study sample comprised 1,119 women at 39.7 ± 1.1 weeks with an average duration of labor of 4.1 ± 2.4 hours. The rate of oxytocin use was 27 percent and of epidural analgesia 5 percent. The rate of oxytocin use was inversely related to cervical dilation on admission. Cesarean delivery was performed in 6 percent of women. Duration of labor at each centimeter of cervical dilation on admission showed a broad distribution (e.g., at 4 cm: median = 5.5, range: 0.8-12.5 hr). The rate of labor progression (expressed as the slope of the dilation-vs-time curve) was approximately 1.5 cm/hr, and it was essentially independent of cervical dilation on admission (r = 0.034, p = 0.267). A deceleration phase seemed to be present toward the end of the active phase of labor (approximately 9 cm).
CONCLUSION: In our setting, the rate of labor in nulliparous women at term was highly variable, and it did not appear to be affected by cervical dilation on admission.
© 2010, Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation © 2010, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21332772     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00443.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  5 in total

1.  Physiologic partograph to improve birth safety and outcomes among low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset.

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Nancy K Lowe
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 1.538

2.  Labor patterns in Chinese women in Fuzhou attempting vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lianghui Zheng; Qinjian Zhang; Qiuping Liao; Rongxin Chen; Rongli Xu; Qing Han; Jianying Yan
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 1.671

3.  Hospital Admission in the Latent versus the Active Phase of Labor: Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Viola Seravalli; Noemi Strambi; Enrica Castellana; Maria Alessia Salamina; Chiara Bettini; Mariarosaria Di Tommaso
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20

Review 4.  Diagnosing onset of labor: a systematic review of definitions in the research literature.

Authors:  Gillian E Hanley; Sarah Munro; Devon Greyson; Mechthild M Gross; Vanora Hundley; Helen Spiby; Patricia A Janssen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Factors affecting labor duration in Chinese pregnant women.

Authors:  Hongqin Chen; Liyuan Cao; Wen Cao; Hui Wang; Cairong Zhu; Rong Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.