Literature DB >> 21332771

Older maternal age and intervention in labor: a population-based study comparing older and younger first-time mothers in Victoria, Australia.

Mary Carolan1, Mary-Ann Davey, Mary Anne Biro, Michelle Kealy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Australia, birth rates for women aged 35 years or more are significant and increasing and a considerable percentage are first births. This study investigated the effect of maternal age on interventions in labor and birth for primiparous women aged 35 to 44 years compared with primiparous women aged 25 to 29 years.
METHODS: All primiparous women who gave birth in Victoria, Australia, in 2005 and 2006 (n = 57,426) were included in this population-based cross-sectional study. Women were stratified by admission status (private/public). Main outcome measures were induction of labor, augmentation of labor, use of epidural analgesia, and method of birth. Multivariate logistic regression was used to explore the relationship between maternal age and cesarean adjusted for confounders.
RESULTS: Older women were more likely to give birth by cesarean section whether admitted as public or private patients. For private patients, total cesarean rates were 31.8 percent (25-29 yr), 46.0 percent (35-39 yr), and 60.0 percent (40-44 yr; p < 0.001) compared with 27.5, 41.6, and 53.4 percent for public patients (p < 0.001). Older women who experienced labor were more likely to have an instrumental vaginal birth or an emergency cesarean section than younger women. Both were more common in women admitted as private patients. Age-related trends were also seen for induction of labor and use of epidural analgesia. Rates were higher for private patients. Rates of induction were (37.8, 40.2, and 42.5%) for private patients compared with (32.1, 36.7, and 40.1%) for public patients and rates for epidural were (45.3, 49.9, and 48.1%) among private patients compared with (33.3, 38.8, and 39.3%) among public patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventions in labor and birth increased with maternal age, and this effect was seen particularly for cesarean section among women admitted privately. These findings were not fully explained by the complications we considered.
© 2010, Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation © 2010, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21332771     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00439.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  6 in total

1.  Factors associated with caesarean deliveries among child-bearing women in Pakistan: secondary analysis of data from the Demographic and Health Survey, 2012-13.

Authors:  Aaisha Amjad; Uzair Amjad; Rubeena Zakar; Ahmed Usman; Muhammad Zakria Zakar; Florian Fischer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Trends of caesarean section deliveries in Pakistan: secondary data analysis from Demographic and Health Surveys, 1990-2018.

Authors:  Aaisha Amjad; Abeeha Imran; Nabeeha Shahram; Rubeena Zakar; Ahmed Usman; Muhammad Zakria Zakar; Florian Fischer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Very advanced maternal age and morbidity in Victoria, Australia: a population based study.

Authors:  Mary C Carolan; Mary-Ann Davey; Maryanne Biro; Michelle Kealy
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Temporal evolution of the risk factors associated with low birth weight rates in Brazilian capitals (1996-2011).

Authors:  Viviane Costa de Souza Buriol; Vânia Hirakata; Marcelo Zubaran Goldani; Clécio Homrich da Silva
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2016-05-03

5.  Pregnancy at very advanced maternal age: a UK population-based cohort study.

Authors:  K E Fitzpatrick; D Tuffnell; J J Kurinczuk; M Knight
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Early-term birth and its association with universal two-child policy: a national cross-sectional study in China.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Gareth J Williams; Guanghua Wang; Jingjing Chen; Mengyu Zhang; Wenchong Du; Jing Zhu; Jun Zhang; Jing Hua
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.