Literature DB >> 21331946

Evaluation of commonly-used farm disinfectants in wet and dry models of Salmonella farm contamination.

Ian McLaren1, Andrew Wales, Mark Breslin, Robert Davies.   

Abstract

Two experimental models of Salmonella contamination were used in an attempt to mimic the conditions of disinfectant use on farms. A wet model, for conditions such as boot dips, used disinfectant application to a slurry of poultry faeces inoculated with Salmonella Enteritidis or Salmonella Typhimurium. A dry model, for disinfectant application to surfaces and equipment with adherent or residual organic material, used Salmonella-inoculated poultry faeces that were air-dried onto wooden dowels, immersed in disinfectant solution then left in air at room temperature overnight. All samples were subjected to a disinfectant neutralization step and resuscitation in broth, followed by Salmonella culture on semi-solid then indicator media. Disinfectants were tested at 0.5x, 1x and 2x the concentrations specified for the general control of bacterial pathogens on livestock premises in the UK (Defra General Orders rates). Chlorocresol-based disinfectants provided consistently high rates of Salmonella killing in both wet and dry tests. Formaldehyde-containing disinfectants showed very high efficacy in the dry test but were less effective in the shorter wet test, whereas the efficacy of glutaraldehyde without formaldehyde was variable between products. Other chemical classes tested (quaternary ammonium compounds, amphoteric surfactants, iodine preparations, peroxygens and a substituted phenol blend) were only moderately effective. They often required concentrations above General Orders rates to eliminate the test salmonellas, and frequently elimination was not achieved even under maximal conditions of concentration and exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21331946     DOI: 10.1080/03079457.2010.537303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Pathol        ISSN: 0307-9457            Impact factor:   3.378


  5 in total

1.  Herd- and individual-level prevalences of and risk factors for Salmonella spp. fecal shedding in dairy farms in Al-Dhulail Valley, Jordan.

Authors:  Yaser H Tarazi; Mahmoud N Abo-Shehada
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Inclusion of detergent in a cleaning regime and effect on microbial load in livestock housing.

Authors:  L R Hancox; M Le Bon; C E R Dodd; K H Mellits
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  Evaluation of an enhanced cleaning and disinfection protocol in Salmonella contaminated pig holdings in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Francesca Martelli; Mark Lambert; Paul Butt; Tanya Cheney; Fabrizio Antonio Tatone; Rebecca Callaby; André Rabie; Rebecca J Gosling; Steve Fordon; Graham Crocker; Robert H Davies; Richard Piers Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Efficacy evaluation of commercial disinfectants by using Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium as a test organism.

Authors:  Yangho Jang; Kwangjick Lee; Seonjong Yun; Myoungheon Lee; Jaeyoung Song; Byungjoon Chang; Nong-Hoon Choe
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 1.672

Review 5.  Co-Selection of Resistance to Antibiotics, Biocides and Heavy Metals, and Its Relevance to Foodborne Pathogens.

Authors:  Andrew D Wales; Robert H Davies
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2015-11-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.