Literature DB >> 21331942

Methodological aspects of multicenter studies with quantitative PET.

Ronald Boellaard1.   

Abstract

Quantification of whole-body FDG PET studies is affected by many physiological and physical factors. Much of the variability in reported standardized uptake value (SUV) data seen in the literature results from the variability in methodology applied among these studies, i.e., due to the use of different scanners, acquisition and reconstruction settings, region of interest strategies, SUV normalization, and/or corrections methods. To date, the variability in applied methodology prohibits a proper comparison and exchange of quantitative FDG PET data. Consequently, the promising role of quantitative PET has been demonstrated in several monocentric studies, but these published results cannot be used directly as a guideline for clinical (multicenter) trials performed elsewhere. In this chapter, the main causes affecting whole-body FDG PET quantification and strategies to minimize its inter-institute variability are addressed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21331942     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-062-1_18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  5 in total

1.  Patient's weight: a neglected cause of variability in SUV measurements? A survey from an EARL accredited PET centre in 513 patients.

Authors:  Charline Lasnon; Benjamin Houdu; Emmanuel Kammerer; Thibault Salomon; Jeremy Devreese; Adrien Lebasnier; Nicolas Aide
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  18F-FDG PET/CT heterogeneity quantification through textural features in the era of harmonisation programs: a focus on lung cancer.

Authors:  Charline Lasnon; Mohamed Majdoub; Brice Lavigne; Pascal Do; Jeannick Madelaine; Dimitris Visvikis; Mathieu Hatt; Nicolas Aide
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  EANM/EARL harmonization strategies in PET quantification: from daily practice to multicentre oncological studies.

Authors:  Nicolas Aide; Charline Lasnon; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Terez Sera; Bernhard Sattler; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  The Strategies to Homogenize PET/CT Metrics: The Case of Onco-Haematological Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Stephane Chauvie; Fabrizio Bergesio
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2016-11-15

5.  EORTC PET response criteria are more influenced by reconstruction inconsistencies than PERCIST but both benefit from the EARL harmonization program.

Authors:  Charline Lasnon; Elske Quak; Pierre-Yves Le Roux; Philippe Robin; Michael S Hofman; David Bourhis; Jason Callahan; David S Binns; Cédric Desmonts; Pierre-Yves Salaun; Rodney J Hicks; Nicolas Aide
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2017-05-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.