Literature DB >> 21331836

Monitoring source in an unconscious plagiarism paradigm.

J D Landau1, R L Marsh.   

Abstract

Current laboratory paradigms used to assess unconscious plagiarism consist of three tasks. First, participants generate solutions to a puzzle task with a partner (initial generation task); second, they recall their individual contribution (recall-own task); and third, they attempt to create new solutions that were not offered previously (generate-new task). An analysis of these tasks indicated that they differ in terms of the source monitoring they require. The two generative tasks require less differentiated information (e.g., familiarity) and relatively lax decision criteria. The recall-own task, however, demands more differentiated information and more extended decision criteria. In two experiments, factors known to influence source monitoring were manipulated. Consistent with the analysis, no effects were associated with the generative tasks. Recall-own plagiarisms increased when self- and other-generated solutions were difficult to distinguish (Experiment 1) and decreased when the two sources were easier to distinguish (Experiment 2).

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 21331836     DOI: 10.3758/BF03209404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  11 in total

1.  Some problems with the process-dissociation approach to memory.

Authors:  C S Dodson; M K Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-06

2.  The sensory match effect in recognition memory: perceptual fluency or episodic trace?

Authors:  J Gay Snodgrass; E Hirshman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-05

3.  How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity.

Authors:  R L Marsh; J D Landau; J L Hicks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-09

4.  Cryptomnesia and plagiarism.

Authors:  F K Taylor
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 9.319

5.  Eliciting cryptomnesia: unconscious plagiarism in a puzzle task.

Authors:  R L Marsh; G H Bower
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory.

Authors:  M S Zaragoza; S M Lane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Time-course studies of reality monitoring and recognition.

Authors:  M K Johnson; J Kounios; J A Reeder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Aging, source, and decision criteria: when false fame errors do and do not occur.

Authors:  K S Multhaup
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1995-09

10.  Developmental changes in memory source monitoring.

Authors:  D S Lindsay; M K Johnson; P Kwon
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1991-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Anticipating partners' responses: examining item and source memory following interactive exchanges.

Authors:  Mary Ann Foley; Hugh J Foley; Jaime R Durley; Angela T Maitner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-10

2.  The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task.

Authors:  R L Marsh; T B Ward; J D Landau
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

3.  Inadvertent plagiarism in young and older adults: the role of working memory capacity in reducing memory errors.

Authors:  David P McCabe; Anderson D Smith; Colleen M Parks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

4.  The effects of repeated idea elaboration on unconscious plagiarism.

Authors:  Louisa-Jayne Stark; Timothy J Perfect
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

5.  Mental simulation inflates performance estimates for physical abilities.

Authors:  Joshua D Landau; Terry M Libkuman; Jonathon C Wildman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.