Literature DB >> 21331833

Shape equivalence under perspective and projective transformations.

J Wagemans1, C Lamote, L Van Gool.   

Abstract

When a planar shape is viewed obliquely, it is deformed by a perspective deformation. If the visual system were to pick up geometrical invariants from such projections, these would necessarily be invariant under the wider class of projective transformations. To what extent can the visual system tell the difference between perspective and nonperspective but still projective deformations of shapes? To investigate this, observers were asked to indicate which of two test patterns most resembled a standard pattern. The test patterns were related to the standard pattern by a perspective or projective transformation, or they were completely unrelated. Performance was slightly better in a matching task with perspective and unrelated test patterns (92.6%) than in a projective-random matching task (88.8%). In a direct comparison, participants had a small preference (58.5%) for the perspectively related patterns over the projectively related ones. Preferences were based on the values of the transformation parameters (slant and shear). Hence, perspective and projective transformations yielded perceptual differences, but they were not treated in a categorically different manner by the human visual system.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 21331833     DOI: 10.3758/BF03209401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  19 in total

1.  Aging faces as viscal-elastic events: implications for a theory of nonrigid shape perception.

Authors:  J B Pittenger; R E Shaw
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Projective invariance and the kinetic depth effect.

Authors:  K K Niall
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1992-11

3.  Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  M J Tarr
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-03

4.  Compensation is unnecessary for the perception of faces in slanted pictures.

Authors:  T A Busey; N P Brady; J E Cutting
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-07

5.  3-D shape perception.

Authors:  Z Pizlo; M Salach-Golyska
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-07

6.  Aligning pictorial descriptions: an approach to object recognition.

Authors:  S Ullman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1989-08

7.  Spatial layout, orientation relative to the observer, and perceived projection in pictures viewed at an angle.

Authors:  E B Goldstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Invariance from the Euclidean geometer's perspective.

Authors:  L J Van Gool; T Moons; E Pauwels; J Wagemans
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 9.  A theory of shape constancy based on perspective invariants.

Authors:  Z Pizlo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Perception of growth: a geometric analysis of how different styles of change are distinguished.

Authors:  L S Mark; J T Todd; R E Shaw
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  4 in total

1.  Investigating shape representation using sensitivity to part- and axis-based transformations.

Authors:  Kristina Denisova; Jacob Feldman; Xiaotao Su; Manish Singh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Towards a new kind of experimental psycho-aesthetics? Reflections on the Parallellepipeda project.

Authors:  Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2011-10-19

3.  Development of differential sensitivity for shape changes resulting from linear and nonlinear planar transformations.

Authors:  Bart Ons; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2011-05-19

4.  A conceptual framework of computations in mid-level vision.

Authors:  Jonas Kubilius; Johan Wagemans; Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.380

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.